Re: [slf4j-dev] Follow-up to Rearranging classes

2007-02-16 Thread Ceki Gülcü
At 07:32 PM 2/16/2007, Sebastien Pennec wrote: >Hello all, > >I've just committed some changes about the LoggerFactory class. > >Now, the api module contains the LoggerFactory class, it is not present in >the other >modules anymore. It also contains a dummy StaticLoggerBinder >implementation to m

Re: [slf4j-dev] Follow-up to Rearranging classes

2007-02-16 Thread Eric Crahen
Great. I think we should now move forward with replacing that with the Service API. On 2/16/07, Sebastien Pennec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello all, I've just committed some changes about the LoggerFactory class. Now, the api module contains the LoggerFactory class, it is not present in th

[slf4j-dev] Follow-up to Rearranging classes

2007-02-16 Thread Sebastien Pennec
Hello all, I've just committed some changes about the LoggerFactory class. Now, the api module contains the LoggerFactory class, it is not present in the other modules anymore. It also contains a dummy StaticLoggerBinder implementation to make sure it compiles nicely. This dummy class is rem