[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2752?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13588065#comment-13588065
]
Carsten Ziegeler commented on SLING-2752:
-
I think once SLING-2477 is implemented
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13588063#comment-13588063
]
Carsten Ziegeler commented on SLING-2477:
-
I think write back is a different issue
I was thinking of covering this first with a multi threaded unit test
to verify no concurrency issues and to give an idea of maximum
throughput, since a centralised counter working off logging API
markers could be used anywhere.
I will do before after testing as well.
Ian
On 26 February 2013 17:5
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2742?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ian Boston resolved SLING-2742.
---
Resolution: Fixed
unnecessary interface removed, marking as fixed.
> Expose Reposito
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2742?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ian Boston reopened SLING-2742:
---
Reopening to remove the RepositoryStatisticsMBean interface as discussed on
list.
> Exp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13587965#comment-13587965
]
Ian Boston commented on SLING-2477:
---
@Justin I might have done more analysis, but I have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13587892#comment-13587892
]
Justin Edelson commented on SLING-2477:
---
@Ian - despite my reservations on the type"
Ian Boston created SLING-2756:
-
Summary: Document sling:OsgiConfig format and properties format
Key: SLING-2756
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2756
Project: Sling
Issue Type: B
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13587796#comment-13587796
]
Ian Boston commented on SLING-2477:
---
(apologies for saying "consensus" earlier).
To sum
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13587286#comment-13587286
]
Tyson Norris commented on SLING-2477:
-
+1 for type info in the value (not the property
Beware ;-) XXL mail with multiple proposals, the more interesting ones coming
later...
On 25.02.2013, at 14:48, Shashank Gupta wrote:
> This would make it simpler to switch to a Range-header based upload if it
> might be standardized around HTTP in the future.
>
> [SG] Range based upload is no
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ben Peter updated SLING-2730:
-
Attachment: SLING-2730-take2.patch
> Allow JSPs to be excluded from compilation in maven-jspc-plugin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13587202#comment-13587202
]
Ben Peter commented on SLING-2730:
--
Sounds good. I'm attaching a patch that implements th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13587151#comment-13587151
]
Justin Edelson commented on SLING-2477:
---
I'm not sure why one would want to use the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13587145#comment-13587145
]
Carsten Ziegeler commented on SLING-2477:
-
Ok, yes, so there are use cases for dir
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13587134#comment-13587134
]
Justin Edelson commented on SLING-2477:
---
@Carsten - this is perhaps OT, but configur
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13587127#comment-13587127
]
Carsten Ziegeler commented on SLING-2477:
-
I disagree :) - it's true that this is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13587091#comment-13587091
]
Justin Edelson commented on SLING-2477:
---
I completely agree with Alex and I really d
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Carsten Ziegeler resolved SLING-2708.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Resource Resolver 1.0.6
As we have changed the wh
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Carsten Ziegeler resolved SLING-2739.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Add methods for handling the resource type hierarchy to the resou
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13587020#comment-13587020
]
Carsten Ziegeler commented on SLING-2739:
-
I renamed the new methods to getParentR
Thanks, Felix
Am 26.02.2013 um 11:26 schrieb Ian Boston:
> Hi
> Added last week in the current snapshot. They have never been released.
> Ian
>
> On Tuesday, February 26, 2013, Felix Meschberger wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Did these MBeans already exist in the Event 3.1.4 bundle ? or have they
>> been
Hi,
Good point. I'll drop the interface and remove the export.
Ian
On Tuesday, February 26, 2013, Felix Meschberger wrote:
> Hi
>
> The MBean interface is not required. You can register the service under
> any type you like as long as the jmx.objectname service property is set and
> the object ca
Hi
Added last week in the current snapshot. They have never been released.
Ian
On Tuesday, February 26, 2013, Felix Meschberger wrote:
> Hi
>
> Did these MBeans already exist in the Event 3.1.4 bundle ? or have they
> been added since then ?
>
> In the first case, this renaming constitues a backw
Hi
Did these MBeans already exist in the Event 3.1.4 bundle ? or have they been
added since then ?
In the first case, this renaming constitues a backwards breaking change.
Otherwise I am fine with renaming.
Regards
Felix
Am 26.02.2013 um 05:46 schrieb Ian Boston (JIRA):
> Ian Boston created
Hi
The MBean interface is not required. You can register the service under any
type you like as long as the jmx.objectname service property is set and the
object can be used as an MBean in the server.
Since this MBean interface is only an unused marker and the MBean is described
as a DynamicMB
Hi,
Am 26.02.2013 um 05:04 schrieb Dan Klco:
> Felix,
>
> I like the idea of creating a separate Resource API tag library. I think
> there's enough functionality there to justify it and it may or may not be
> something needed for every Sling installation and would reduce the number of
> depe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13586987#comment-13586987
]
Alexander Klimetschek commented on SLING-2477:
--
@Felix: good points. Though t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13586914#comment-13586914
]
Felix Meschberger commented on SLING-2477:
--
FIrst off: Yes, I admit that I don't
29 matches
Mail list logo
