Re: [DISCUSSION] Sling CMS Repo(s)

On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 7:12 AM, Robert Munteanu wrote: > Hi Dan, > > On Fri, 2018-05-25 at 10:46 -0400, Daniel Klco wrote: > > Hey All, > > > > I've wrapped up all of the things I wanted to fix before releasing > > the > > first version of the Sling CMS Sample app. > > Awesome! Having a good

[jira] [Commented] (SLING-7695) Introduce Readable Names for SDI Configuration Entries in OSGi

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16495552#comment-16495552 ] Jason E Bailey commented on SLING-7695: --- (y) I'm a fan. > Introduce Readable Names for SDI

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling JCR ContentLoader 2.2.6

Good to know about where Pax exam is configured. Honestly trying to update dependencies was a nightmare. Just updating the jcr commons dependency to the latest caused my eclipse environment to die a horrid death. - Jason On Wed, May 30, 2018, at 7:40 AM, Robert Munteanu wrote: > On Wed,

[jira] [Created] (SLING-7699) Add ability to stream a Resource tree to API

Jason E Bailey created SLING-7699: - Summary: Add ability to stream a Resource tree to API Key: SLING-7699 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7699 Project: Sling Issue Type:

[jira] [Resolved] (SLING-7697) Move feature resolving from ApplicationBuilder to FeatureBuilder

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Carsten Ziegeler resolved SLING-7697. - Resolution: Fixed > Move feature resolving from ApplicationBuilder to FeatureBuilder >

[jira] [Resolved] (SLING-7698) Move deduplication of features to FeatureBuilder

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Carsten Ziegeler resolved SLING-7698. - Resolution: Fixed > Move deduplication of features to FeatureBuilder >

[jira] [Created] (SLING-7698) Move deduplication of features to FeatureBuilder

Carsten Ziegeler created SLING-7698: --- Summary: Move deduplication of features to FeatureBuilder Key: SLING-7698 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7698 Project: Sling Issue

[jira] [Created] (SLING-7697) Move feature resolving from ApplicationBuilder to FeatureBuilder

Carsten Ziegeler created SLING-7697: --- Summary: Move feature resolving from ApplicationBuilder to FeatureBuilder Key: SLING-7697 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7697 Project: Sling

Re: How can I remove artifacts from the feature model?

I fixed the logic with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7696 Regards Carsten Carsten Ziegeler wrote > I just had a quick look at the ApplicationBuilder class and its really > missing the logic. Right now its processing all features one after the > other without considering that one

[jira] [Resolved] (SLING-7696) Includes are not taken into account when assembling an application

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Carsten Ziegeler resolved SLING-7696. - Resolution: Fixed I fixed this in rev 0a203c3 and added a test case for this > Includes

[jira] [Created] (SLING-7696) Includes are not taken into account when assembling an application

Carsten Ziegeler created SLING-7696: --- Summary: Includes are not taken into account when assembling an application Key: SLING-7696 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7696 Project:

[GitHub] toniedzwiedz commented on issue #4: Provide name hints for SDI configuration entries

toniedzwiedz commented on issue #4: Provide name hints for SDI configuration entries URL: https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-dynamic-include/pull/4#issuecomment-393234855 Raised a related ticket in the Sling Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7695

[jira] [Created] (SLING-7695) Introduce Readable Names for SDI Configuration Entries in OSGi

Tomasz Niedźwiedź created SLING-7695: Summary: Introduce Readable Names for SDI Configuration Entries in OSGi Key: SLING-7695 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7695 Project: Sling

[GitHub] toniedzwiedz opened a new pull request #4: Provide name hints for SDI configuration entries

toniedzwiedz opened a new pull request #4: Provide name hints for SDI configuration entries URL: https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-dynamic-include/pull/4 Hello, I've found that managing multiple configuration entries is a bit difficult due to how they're presented in

[jira] [Resolved] (SLING-7692) MockSession.revert(false) should send UnsupportedOperationException

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nicolas Peltier resolved SLING-7692. Resolution: Fixed > MockSession.revert(false) should send UnsupportedOperationException >

[jira] [Commented] (SLING-7692) MockSession.revert(false) should send UnsupportedOperationException

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16495381#comment-16495381 ] Nicolas Peltier commented on SLING-7692: [~sseif...@pro-vision.de] done. Please note i had to

[jira] [Updated] (SLING-7692) MockSession.revert(false) should send UnsupportedOperationException

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nicolas Peltier updated SLING-7692: --- Summary: MockSession.revert(false) should send UnsupportedOperationException (was:

[jira] [Commented] (SLING-7692) MockSession should support revert(false)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16495359#comment-16495359 ] Nicolas Peltier commented on SLING-7692: ok will rename this ticket, and do this instead, then,

[jira] [Commented] (SLING-7692) MockSession should support revert(false)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16495349#comment-16495349 ] Stefan Seifert commented on SLING-7692: --- yes it removes everything regardless how it was inserted

[jira] [Commented] (SLING-7692) MockSession should support revert(false)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16495341#comment-16495341 ] Nicolas Peltier commented on SLING-7692: (assuming {{this.items.clear()}} removes also content

[jira] [Commented] (SLING-7692) MockSession should support revert(false)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16495334#comment-16495334 ] Nicolas Peltier commented on SLING-7692: [~sseif...@pro-vision.de] i see...at least then,

[jira] [Commented] (SLING-7687) Some Adapters don't work during service deactivation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16495324#comment-16495324 ] Stefan Seifert commented on SLING-7687: --- i think it makes sense. > Some Adapters don't work during

[jira] [Reopened] (SLING-7692) MockSession should support revert(false)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stefan Seifert reopened SLING-7692: --- sorry, this fix is wrong in my eyes

[jira] [Resolved] (SLING-7694) pipe support for relative input paths

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nicolas Peltier resolved SLING-7694. Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Nicolas Peltier Fix Version/s: pipes 3.0.0 >

[GitHub] ieugen commented on issue #2: Upgraded oak to 1.8.3 + minor version bumps

ieugen commented on issue #2: Upgraded oak to 1.8.3 + minor version bumps URL: https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-starter/pull/2#issuecomment-393197674 Now I get it. Updated both. Thanks. You are killing me :).

Re: How can I remove artifacts from the feature model?

I just had a quick look at the ApplicationBuilder class and its really missing the logic. Right now its processing all features one after the other without considering that one feature might include one of the other provided ones. So the logic needs to be enhanced to first look at the includes,

Re: [Dev] Sling Bundle Installation

Hi, I would also add that you can check bundle status in webconsole:  http://localhost:8080/system/console/bundles . There you can inspect visually if there are any issues with your bundle inside your deployment. They appear in red: missing packages, etc. Of course the same for services, if

Re: How can I remove artifacts from the feature model?

David Bosschaert wrote> Hi Robert,> > On 30 May 2018 at 14:25, Robert Munteanu wrote: > >> Hi David, >> >> On Wed, 2018-05-30 at 13:40 +0100, David Bosschaert wrote: >>> Hi Robert, >>> >>> It should be possible by creating a feature that is "including" >>> another >>> feature and specifies a

[GitHub] ieugen commented on issue #3: Upgrade sling dependencies - minor bumps

ieugen commented on issue #3: Upgrade sling dependencies - minor bumps URL: https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-starter/pull/3#issuecomment-393191457 p.s. I will have push some docker changes soonish. I'm deploying with adoptopenjdk jdk-10 and I would like to push for that.

[GitHub] rombert commented on issue #2: Upgraded oak to 1.8.3 + minor version bumps

rombert commented on issue #2: Upgraded oak to 1.8.3 + minor version bumps URL: https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-starter/pull/2#issuecomment-393191222 We keep the Jackrabbit version in sync with the one that Oak uses. It can happen that Jackrabbit adds new APIs that need

[GitHub] ieugen commented on issue #3: Upgrade sling dependencies - minor bumps

ieugen commented on issue #3: Upgrade sling dependencies - minor bumps URL: https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-starter/pull/3#issuecomment-393190648 I've reverted the version upgrade for `webconsolesecurityprovider` provider version from 1.2.0 -> 1.0.0 . This fixed the

[GitHub] ieugen commented on issue #2: Upgraded oak to 1.8.3 + minor version bumps

ieugen commented on issue #2: Upgraded oak to 1.8.3 + minor version bumps URL: https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-starter/pull/2#issuecomment-393184357 Ah, it slipped my eye. Is that a bad thing? I thought jackrabbit 2.16.x is a stable branch and it is also the (major)

Re: How can I remove artifacts from the feature model?

Hi Robert, On 30 May 2018 at 14:25, Robert Munteanu wrote: > Hi David, > > On Wed, 2018-05-30 at 13:40 +0100, David Bosschaert wrote: > > Hi Robert, > > > > It should be possible by creating a feature that is "including" > > another > > feature and specifies a number of removals. An example can

[jira] [Created] (SLING-7694) pipe support for relative input paths

Nicolas Peltier created SLING-7694: -- Summary: pipe support for relative input paths Key: SLING-7694 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7694 Project: Sling Issue Type:

Re: moving streams from whiteboard

On Wed, 2018-05-30 at 08:36 -0400, Jason E Bailey wrote: > I was actually implying that the ResourceStream class which is a > singular object file would fit best in the Sling Resource API like > Eugen suggested. It's a fundamental feature of Java 8 which would be > beneficial to a number of

Re: [Dev] Sling Bundle Installation

On Wed, 2018-05-30 at 18:16 +0530, Hasini Witharana wrote: > Hi Robert, > > Thank you for the help. I followed your steps and, now the endpoint > is > working. That's great to hear! Looking forward to the updated PR :-) Thanks, Robert

Re: How can I remove artifacts from the feature model?

Hi David, On Wed, 2018-05-30 at 13:40 +0100, David Bosschaert wrote: > Hi Robert, > > It should be possible by creating a feature that is "including" > another > feature and specifies a number of removals. An example can be found > at [1]. > > Having said that, I haven't tried this myself yet,

Re: [api] creating jcr paths with ResourceUtil

assumed my assumption was right with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7693 and fixed it Le mer. 30 mai 2018 à 11:41, Nicolas Peltier a écrit : > Am i right to assume it is wrong to try to write JCR paths with > ResourceUtil [0], as even if at some point resource type parameter would

[jira] [Resolved] (SLING-7693) PathPipe should support pure JCR path creation when nodeType is specified

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nicolas Peltier resolved SLING-7693. Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Nicolas Peltier Fix Version/s: pipes 3.0.0 >

[jira] [Created] (SLING-7693) PathPipe should support pure JCR path creation when nodeType is specified

Nicolas Peltier created SLING-7693: -- Summary: PathPipe should support pure JCR path creation when nodeType is specified Key: SLING-7693 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7693 Project:

Re: [Dev] Sling Bundle Installation

Hi Robert, Thank you for the help. I followed your steps and, now the endpoint is working. On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 4:32 PM, Robert Munteanu wrote: > Hi Hasini, > > On Wed, 2018-05-30 at 09:30 +0530, Hasini Witharana wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I installed a new bundle using the command "

Re: How can I remove artifacts from the feature model?

Hi Robert, It should be possible by creating a feature that is "including" another feature and specifies a number of removals. An example can be found at [1]. Having said that, I haven't tried this myself yet, so I'm not 100% sure it's fully implemented right now. Best regards, David [1]

Re: moving streams from whiteboard

Hah. Always fun to be first :) I was actually implying that the ResourceStream class which is a singular object file would fit best in the Sling Resource API like Eugen suggested. It's a fundamental feature of Java 8 which would be beneficial to a number of bundles. I'll open a pull request

[jira] [Resolved] (SLING-7692) MockSession should support revert(false)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nicolas Peltier resolved SLING-7692. Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Nicolas Peltier Fix Version/s: Testing JCR Mock

[GitHub] rombert commented on issue #2: Upgraded oak to 1.8.3 + minor version bumps

rombert commented on issue #2: Upgraded oak to 1.8.3 + minor version bumps URL: https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-starter/pull/2#issuecomment-393140638 At

[GitHub] rombert commented on issue #3: Upgrade sling dependencies - minor bumps

rombert commented on issue #3: Upgrade sling dependencies - minor bumps URL: https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-starter/pull/3#issuecomment-393140366 I can't test myself now, best to leave the specific artifacts out and file a bug or write to dev@sling

[jira] [Created] (SLING-7692) MockSession should support revert(false)

Nicolas Peltier created SLING-7692: -- Summary: MockSession should support revert(false) Key: SLING-7692 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7692 Project: Sling Issue Type:

How can I remove artifacts from the feature model?

Hi, I am trying to build a product with the feature model and what to remove certain artifacts (bundles) from it. I would like to make it a generic removal based on groupId and artifactId, without specifying the version. How can I do that using the feature model? Thanks, Robert

[GitHub] ieugen commented on issue #3: Upgrade sling dependencies - minor bumps

ieugen commented on issue #3: Upgrade sling dependencies - minor bumps URL: https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-starter/pull/3#issuecomment-393136253 There is definitly somthing wrong there: - basic auth works initially - in the first seconds after start - then it does

[GitHub] ieugen commented on issue #2: Upgraded oak to 1.8.3 + minor version bumps

ieugen commented on issue #2: Upgraded oak to 1.8.3 + minor version bumps URL: https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-starter/pull/2#issuecomment-393135051 > You still have a changed jackrabbit.version in that PR. I'm not following you. Could you please recheck and be

[GitHub] ieugen commented on issue #2: Upgraded oak to 1.8.3 + minor version bumps

ieugen commented on issue #2: Upgraded oak to 1.8.3 + minor version bumps URL: https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-starter/pull/2#issuecomment-393135051 > You still have a changed jackrabbit.version in that PR. I'm not following you. Could you please recheck and be more

[GitHub] rombert commented on issue #3: Upgrade sling dependencies - minor bumps

rombert commented on issue #3: Upgrade sling dependencies - minor bumps URL: https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-starter/pull/3#issuecomment-393133101 > There is an issue with the integration test and authentification for /system/console/bundles. I think that's OK. If

[GitHub] ieugen commented on issue #3: Upgrade sling dependencies - minor bumps

ieugen commented on issue #3: Upgrade sling dependencies - minor bumps URL: https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-starter/pull/3#issuecomment-393132621 There is an issue with the integration test and authentification for /system/console/bundles.

[GitHub] ieugen commented on issue #3: Upgrade sling dependencies - minor bumps

ieugen commented on issue #3: Upgrade sling dependencies - minor bumps URL: https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-starter/pull/3#issuecomment-393132621 There is an issue with the authentification for /system/console - it requires form baed auth and should use basic auth.

[GitHub] rombert commented on issue #2: Upgraded oak to 1.8.3 + minor version bumps

rombert commented on issue #2: Upgraded oak to 1.8.3 + minor version bumps URL: https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-starter/pull/2#issuecomment-393132556 You still have a changed `jackrabbit.version` in that PR.

[GitHub] ieugen commented on issue #2: Upgraded oak to 1.8.3 + minor version bumps

ieugen commented on issue #2: Upgraded oak to 1.8.3 + minor version bumps URL: https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-starter/pull/2#issuecomment-393130390 Hi, done. See #3. Thanks This is an automated message

[GitHub] ieugen opened a new pull request #3: Upgrade sling dependencies - minor bumps

ieugen opened a new pull request #3: Upgrade sling dependencies - minor bumps URL: https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-starter/pull/3 Signed-off-by: Ioan Eugen Stan This is an automated message from the Apache

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling JCR ContentLoader 2.2.6

On Wed, 2018-05-30 at 11:26 +0200, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2018-05-30 09:31, Robert Munteanu wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Sun, 2018-05-27 at 09:10 +0200, Julian Reschke wrote: > > > FWIW, > > > > > er/b > > > lob/master/pom.xml>

[GitHub] rombert commented on a change in pull request #2: Upgraded oak to 1.8.3 + minor version bumps

rombert commented on a change in pull request #2: Upgraded oak to 1.8.3 + minor version bumps URL: https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-starter/pull/2#discussion_r191730836 ## File path: src/main/provisioning/sling.txt ## @@ -58,31 +58,31 @@

[GitHub] ieugen opened a new pull request #2: Upgraded oak to 1.8.3 + minor version bumps

ieugen opened a new pull request #2: Upgraded oak to 1.8.3 + minor version bumps URL: https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-starter/pull/2 * lots of upgrades for sling dependencies - minor version bumps Signed-off-by: Ioan Eugen Stan

Re: moving streams from whiteboard

On Tue, 2018-05-29 at 17:53 -0400, Jason E Bailey wrote: > IMHO the ResourceStream should be in one of the core packages. Does that mean inclusion in the Sling Starter app? That should definitely be OK. We don't have strict inclusion criteria for the starter but we can start now :-) with: - an

Re: moving streams from whiteboard

On Tue, 2018-05-29 at 11:47 -0400, Jason E Bailey wrote: > @PMC folk, what do I need to get these set up as it's own repo? Decide on what you want the Bundle-SymbolicName/artifactId to be and ask for opinions on that, according to [1]: "It is recommended to announce the intention on the mailing

Re: [DISCUSSION] Sling CMS Repo(s)

Hi Dan, On Fri, 2018-05-25 at 10:46 -0400, Daniel Klco wrote: > Hey All, > > I've wrapped up all of the things I wanted to fix before releasing > the > first version of the Sling CMS Sample app. Awesome! Having a good reference app will be quite useful. > > I'm thinking of creating two

Re: [Dev] Sling Bundle Installation

Hi Hasini, On Wed, 2018-05-30 at 09:30 +0530, Hasini Witharana wrote: > Hi all, > > I installed a new bundle using the command " mvn clean install > sling:install". After that I checked the bundle in " > http://localhost:8080/system/console/status-Bundles; and bundle is > active. > But when I

[api] creating jcr paths with ResourceUtil

Am i right to assume it is wrong to try to write JCR paths with ResourceUtil [0], as even if at some point resource type parameter would be used for setting the node type, first designed thing is resource type, which can't always work. My specific not so seldom use case is creating an AEM path

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling JCR ContentLoader 2.2.6

On 2018-05-30 09:31, Robert Munteanu wrote: Hi, On Sun, 2018-05-27 at 09:10 +0200, Julian Reschke wrote: FWIW, shows a few ancient (or even end-of-lifed) Jackrabbit dependencies. I would recommend to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling JCR ContentLoader 2.2.6

Hi, On Sun, 2018-05-27 at 09:10 +0200, Julian Reschke wrote: > FWIW, > lob/master/pom.xml> > shows a few ancient (or even end-of-lifed) Jackrabbit dependencies. > > I would recommend to update to the latest stable release