hello jason.
yes, this makes sense.
stefan
>-Original Message-
>From: Jason E Bailey [mailto:j...@apache.org]
>Sent: Sunday, May 6, 2018 7:21 PM
>To: dev@sling.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [Discussion] Date handling inconsistencies - resend
>
>I've been giving
On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 7:21 PM, Jason E Bailey wrote:
> ...I think the appropriate choice is to have it default to ISO-8601 formatting
> while providing an option to "enable support for the deprecated
> ECMA formatting"...
+1 assuming tests cover both options, thanks for investigating!
-Bertrand
first step - although it would be fine to
> have it by default to ISO-8601 in the future for new applications.
>
> stefan
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Jason E Bailey [mailto:j...@apache.org]
> >Sent: Monday, April 23, 2018 8:37 PM
> >To: dev@sling.
org
>Subject: Re: [Discussion] Date handling inconsistencies - resend
>
>For the JSON rendering, would a service configuration to enable ISO8601
>date support be sufficient initially?
>
>
>- Jason
>
>On Mon, Apr 23, 2018, at 12:58 PM, Jason E Bailey wrote:
>> I
I see what you're saying. I will get some unit tests in specifically around
formatting, which is where the problems might crop up.
- Jason
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018, at 4:24 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 6:58 PM, Jason E Bailey wrote:
> > ...I'll just come o
Hi Jason,
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 6:58 PM, Jason E Bailey wrote:
> ...I'll just come out and say that someone, somewhere, will have something
> break because of this...
Could you write some simple tests that demonstrate those potential breakages?
I think that's the most precise way of expressi
For the JSON rendering, would a service configuration to enable ISO8601 date
support be sufficient initially?
- Jason
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018, at 12:58 PM, Jason E Bailey wrote:
> I'll just come out and say that someone, somewhere, will have something
> break because of this. Because they wrote s
I'll just come out and say that someone, somewhere, will have something break
because of this. Because they wrote something that is very specific to a
particular use case.
>From a loading of content perspective, the two changes I made keep the same
>instance in time, they just correctly store t
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Jason E Bailey wrote:
> ...I cam to the same conclusion about the Content Loader, I'll make the bug
> and fix for that either today or
> tomorrow. For the second point, I will go ahead and make the bug fix, and do
> a pull request so that
> we can get addit
I cam to the same conclusion about the Content Loader, I'll make the bug and
fix for that either today or tomorrow. For the second point, I will go ahead
and make the bug fix, and do a pull request so that we can get additional input
on it. But I believe it's one of those things that will need
:j...@apache.org]
>Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2018 6:20 PM
>To: dev@sling.apache.org
>Subject: [Discussion] Date handling inconsistencies - resend
>
>I'm re-sending this as I had a problem with my webmail and the formatting
>got messed up for the text view.
>
>We have incon
I'm re-sending this as I had a problem with my webmail and the formatting got
messed up for the text view.
We have inconsistencies on how dates are presented and the formats that are
acceptable. This only includes inconsistent handling of the time zone offset.
Fixing these would mean a change t
12 matches
Mail list logo
