On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 2:43 PM Daniel Klco wrote:
> ...I was thinking that it'd make sense to add links to the GitHub
> repositories to make it easier to find the source code for the bundles...
Sounds good and I think for older modules which haven't been moved to
GitHub we might just point do
ht
Yes, I was thinking that it'd make sense to add links to the GitHub
repositories to make it easier to find the source code for the bundles.
You can see where I was going here:
https://github.com/apache/sling-site/tree/download-enhancements
-Dan
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 9:02 AM Robert Munteanu wr
Hi Dan,
On Thu, 2018-09-27 at 10:22 -0400, Daniel Klco wrote:
> I was going to suggest that we link to the Github sites from the
> Downloads
> page, but while i was testing the concept, I found some major issues
> with
> the list of downloads. There are 34 different downloads which do not
> map to
Should still be supported. Karl, any idea why the repo is missing?
> On 28 Sep 2018, at 09:30, Oliver Lietz wrote:
>
>> 3. Is XSS Compat supported or should that be moved to deprecated as well?
>
> I guess it's supported, Radu?
On Thursday 27 September 2018 10:22:23 Daniel Klco wrote:
> Team,
>
> I was going to suggest that we link to the Github sites from the Downloads
> page, but while i was testing the concept, I found some major issues with
> the list of downloads. There are 34 different downloads which do not map to
Team,
I was going to suggest that we link to the Github sites from the Downloads
page, but while i was testing the concept, I found some major issues with
the list of downloads. There are 34 different downloads which do not map to
a GitHub repository.
Based on some analysis, I believe the followi
