The vote passed with 3 binding votes. Thx for voting!
I'll proceed with the release.
Cheers,
Stefan
On 15/11/16 14:20, "Stefan Egli" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>We solved 4 issues in these discovery releases:
>
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING/fixforversion/12338309
>https://issues.apache.org/j
+1
On 16/11/16 15:03, "Bertrand Delacretaz" wrote:
>I don't think SLING-5231 has any impact on the OSGi package versions
>or wirings, if that's correct releasing as is is fine with me.
at least baseline plugin wasn't complaining, so that part is fine.
I'll let the release & vote continue then norm
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Stefan Egli wrote:
> ...Just realized that perhaps it would have been a good idea to bump the
> minor version numbers for this release, as with SLING-5231 it's now based
> on service user rather than login administrative...
That would have been ideal but I d
Just realized that perhaps it would have been a good idea to bump the
minor version numbers for this release, as with SLING-5231 it's now based
on service user rather than login administrative.
What do people think, should I cancel, bump and redo or leave it as is?
Cheers,
Stefan
On 15/11/16 14:
+1
--
Carsten Ziegeler
Adobe Research Switzerland
cziege...@apache.org
+1
Cheers,
Stefan
On 15/11/16 14:20, "Stefan Egli" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>We solved 4 issues in these discovery releases:
>
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING/fixforversion/12338309
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING/fixforversion/12337847
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLIN
Hi,
We solved 4 issues in these discovery releases:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING/fixforversion/12338309
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING/fixforversion/12337847
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING/fixforversion/12337848
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING/
