Re: Installation and start order for logging (was: [jira] [Commented] (SLING-3386) Enable support starting bundle in custom oreder at start level 1)

2014-02-21 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi, On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > ...I don't think we need 2 if we have 3. If we have support in > list.xml for different boot start levels (that's actually the hard part), > then the implementation can just adjust the start level of available > bundles according to t

Re: Installation and start order for logging (was: [jira] [Commented] (SLING-3386) Enable support starting bundle in custom oreder at start level 1)

2014-02-17 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Thanks, I don't think we need 2 if we have 3. If we have support in list.xml for different boot start levels (that's actually the hard part), then the implementation can just adjust the start level of available bundles according to the new info - this is what the installer does and works quiet well

Re: Installation and start order for logging (was: [jira] [Commented] (SLING-3386) Enable support starting bundle in custom oreder at start level 1)

2014-02-17 Thread Chetan Mehrotra
Hi Carsten, To summarize. 1. Need to clear the start level 1 and keep only logging related bundles and framework fragments at that level. Move all other bundles to Start Level 2 2. For upgraded system we implement a new Bootstrap command say ChangeStartLevelCommand. This would change the start le

Re: Installation and start order for logging (was: [jira] [Commented] (SLING-3386) Enable support starting bundle in custom oreder at start level 1)

2014-02-17 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Can someone please summarize what exactly is proposed, especially for SLING-3388 ? Thanks Carsten 2014-02-12 11:14 GMT+01:00 Felix Meschberger : > > Am 12.02.2014 um 11:01 schrieb Chetan Mehrotra >: > > > For now I think we can keep the implementation simple. For example in > > current case we

Re: Installation and start order for logging (was: [jira] [Commented] (SLING-3386) Enable support starting bundle in custom oreder at start level 1)

2014-02-12 Thread Felix Meschberger
Am 12.02.2014 um 11:01 schrieb Chetan Mehrotra : > For now I think we can keep the implementation simple. For example in > current case we do not have to change start level for Fragments and > Slf4j related bundle. So need to change start level of some listed > bundles only > >> startlevel 20 40

Re: Installation and start order for logging (was: [jira] [Commented] (SLING-3386) Enable support starting bundle in custom oreder at start level 1)

2014-02-12 Thread Chetan Mehrotra
For now I think we can keep the implementation simple. For example in current case we do not have to change start level for Fragments and Slf4j related bundle. So need to change start level of some listed bundles only > startlevel 20 40 Do not see a requirement to move all existing bundle to diffe

Re: Installation and start order for logging (was: [jira] [Commented] (SLING-3386) Enable support starting bundle in custom oreder at start level 1)

2014-02-12 Thread Felix Meschberger
Hi Am 12.02.2014 um 09:58 schrieb Felix Meschberger : > Hi > > Am 12.02.2014 um 09:22 schrieb Chetan Mehrotra : > >> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Felix Meschberger >> wrote: >>> Hence, I would really prefer to get our start levels straight and reserve 1 >>> to logging and move the instal

Re: Installation and start order for logging (was: [jira] [Commented] (SLING-3386) Enable support starting bundle in custom oreder at start level 1)

2014-02-12 Thread Felix Meschberger
Hi Am 12.02.2014 um 09:22 schrieb Chetan Mehrotra : > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Felix Meschberger wrote: >> Hence, I would really prefer to get our start levels straight and reserve 1 >> to logging and move the install stuff to 2. > > You never allow to take the short cut :) I fight sp

Re: Installation and start order for logging (was: [jira] [Commented] (SLING-3386) Enable support starting bundle in custom oreder at start level 1)

2014-02-12 Thread Chetan Mehrotra
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Felix Meschberger wrote: > Hence, I would really prefer to get our start levels straight and reserve 1 > to logging and move the install stuff to 2. You never allow to take the short cut :) Okie thinking about tackling the real problem of moving existing bundle

Installation and start order for logging (was: [jira] [Commented] (SLING-3386) Enable support starting bundle in custom oreder at start level 1)

2014-02-11 Thread Felix Meschberger
Hi Lets take this to the list for a moment .. Am 12.02.2014 um 05:40 schrieb Chetan Mehrotra (JIRA) : > Chetan Mehrotra commented on SLING-3386: > > > bq. treat logging specially in that we define a new "folder" which is handled > first by the bootstrap