Ahh, that makes perfect sense. Thanks for clarifying that.
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 16:04, Ian Boston wrote:
>
> On 30 Jul 2009, at 20:50, Carl Hall wrote:
>
>> am implementing LoginModulePlugin but don't quite understand what
>> you mean by not implementing the login protocol.
>
>
> Ahh sorry,
On 30 Jul 2009, at 20:50, Carl Hall wrote:
am implementing LoginModulePlugin but don't quite understand what
you mean by not implementing the login protocol.
Ahh sorry,
the browser might send a WWW-Authenticate header ... that would be
the http basic auth "protocol" for which there is a
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:13, Ian Boston wrote:
> For just the AuthN part I think you need to implement the LoginModulePlugin
> rather than implementing the login protocol (eg Httpbasic, form etc).
I am implementing LoginModulePlugin but don't quite understand what
you mean by not implementing th
For just the AuthN part I think you need to implement the
LoginModulePlugin rather than implementing the login protocol (eg
Httpbasic, form etc).
So
LoginModulePlugin.canHandle(credentials) should return true for
credentials that have some hope of being authenticated agains LDAP.
and
Logi
