Re: Should we have some basic health checks in org.apache.sling.hc.core?

2014-01-20 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Georg Henzler wrote: > Let's put the basic checks in the support package then (and maybe we can add > a line or two to the description in the pom). Yes, and examples in the samples module are also a good way to expose them. -Bertrand

Re: Should we have some basic health checks in org.apache.sling.hc.core?

2014-01-20 Thread Georg Henzler
Let's put the basic checks in the support package then (and maybe we can add a line or two to the description in the pom). -Georg Am 20.01.2014 10:36, schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz: On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 4:52 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: ...I think we should leave core free of real HCs, suppor

Re: Should we have some basic health checks in org.apache.sling.hc.core?

2014-01-20 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 4:52 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > ...I think we should leave core free of real HCs, support seems to be the > correct project... +1 -Bertrand

Re: Should we have some basic health checks in org.apache.sling.hc.core?

2014-01-19 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
I think we should leave core free of real HCs, support seems to be the correct project Carsten 2014/1/18 Georg Henzler > Hi all, > > I just created three tickets (SLING-3324, SLING-3325, SLING-3326) with > three basic checks that probably every implementation project would need. > Therefore I

Should we have some basic health checks in org.apache.sling.hc.core?

2014-01-18 Thread Georg Henzler
Hi all, I just created three tickets (SLING-3324, SLING-3325, SLING-3326) with three basic checks that probably every implementation project would need. Therefore I think it's best to put them straight into core, but maybe the support project was created to hold HCs like this (the description