Re: releasing 1.0.0 of discovery.commons/.base/.oak

On Mon, 2015-10-26 at 09:18 +0200, Stefan Egli wrote: > Hi Robert, > > On 23/10/15 15:17, "Robert Munteanu" wrote: > > > I'm not 100% caught up with the discovery efforts, so what are the > > current options for discovery in Sling? > > > > I think we have > > > > - impl (

Re: releasing 1.0.0 of discovery.commons/.base/.oak

Hi Robert, On 23/10/15 15:17, "Robert Munteanu" wrote: >I'm not 100% caught up with the discovery efforts, so what are the >current options for discovery in Sling? > >I think we have > >- impl ( current ) this one will be using base + commons too from the next version on.

Re: releasing 1.0.0 of discovery.commons/.base/.oak

FYI: few rounds on jenkins looked fine - I'm releasing the three bundles now. Stay tuned for the voting.. Cheers, Stefan On 26/10/15 12:09, "Robert Munteanu" wrote: >On Mon, 2015-10-26 at 09:18 +0200, Stefan Egli wrote: >> Hi Robert, >> >> On 23/10/15 15:17, "Robert

releasing 1.0.0 of discovery.commons/.base/.oak

Hi, Main development and testing of discovery.commons/.base/.oak is done, at which point I'd propose to cut a 1.0.0 release. That is, unless people feel like this should go through some reviewing first. One thing to mention is that .commons/.base are currently only used by discovery.oak (and

Re: releasing 1.0.0 of discovery.commons/.base/.oak

Hi Stefan, On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 14:00 +0200, Stefan Egli wrote: > Hi, > > Main development and testing of discovery.commons/.base/.oak is done, Good news :-) > at > which point I'd propose to cut a 1.0.0 release. That is, unless > people feel > like this should go through some reviewing