On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 9:17 PM, Felix Meschberger wrote:
> Hi
>
> We may have discussed this similarly in the Jackrabbit days, but alas …
>
> Don’t we want to go with the most recent Oak release from the 1.1.x line ? Or
> is it by intent to stay on the slow, stable 1.0.x line ?
I think we shoul
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 8:17 PM, Felix Meschberger wrote:
> ...Don’t we want to go with the most recent Oak release from the 1.1.x line ?
> Or
> is it by intent to stay on the slow, stable 1.0.x line ?...
I'm not sure how much work keeping up with the 1.1.x line entails -
I'll give it a try when
Hi
We may have discussed this similarly in the Jackrabbit days, but alas …
Don’t we want to go with the most recent Oak release from the 1.1.x line ? Or
is it by intent to stay on the slow, stable 1.0.x line ?
Regards
Felix
Am 14.10.2014 um 17:17 schrieb bdelacre...@apache.org:
> Author: bdel