I felt that V2's lack of support for defaults was a serious architectural
issue that is hard to just close eyes on.
Regards,
Alex
On Tue., Oct. 26, 2021, 3:17 p.m. Eric Pugh, <
ep...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote:
> I’d very much like to see this as well.
>
> I’ve been thinking that I woul
I’d very much like to see this as well.
I’ve been thinking that I would look to migrate the Solr Admin to using the v2
API, and I suspect it will identify any number of gaps/areas of improvement in
the v2 API itself.
> On Oct 26, 2021, at 3:10 PM, Jason Gerlowski wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
Hi all,
I'm starting this thread to highlight a subject that came up in the
recent "Solr 9.0 Release Blockers" thread: our v2 API. As a TL;DR,
should the v2 API be considered "experimental"?
We haven't explicitly called the v2 API experimental up to this point,
but I'd argue that in essence it a
After the long delay and working with Infra, we have a nightly jenkins job
that builds and pushes the docker image.
Whenever we have branch_9x and branch_9_0, etc. We can copy the job for
those branches.
The tags for the image default to the version of Solr being built, so it
should auto-use whate
