Re: Should JVM Args list in Admin UI Dashboard be sorted?

I also very much prefer it be sorted so my eyes can quickly find what I'm looking for (or its absence). ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 4:19 PM Jason Gerlowski wrote: > Personally I like having the arguments sor

Re: First class support for node roles

After so many back and forth mails, I just can't say who has an outstanding concern and if they are already addressed or not. I think the Google doc would help us get clarity on that. Please take a moment to give your inputs On Fri, Nov 19, 2021, 9:18 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < ichattopadhy...@gmai

Re: First class support for node roles

Apologies, the vote hasn't passed formally and I was under some confusion on the process. I'd like to proceed with a lazy consensus and proceed to the implementation phase now. However, I would appreciate it if someone wants to bring out any outstanding concerns about the SIP document. To facili

Re: [VOTE] SIP-15 Node roles

Oh, thanks for pointing that out, Cassandra. Really appreciate it. I had some confusion on the process around votes and lazy consensus (since this is perhaps the only SIP that reached a voting thread and I didn't have any precedence to go by). This vote has actually failed. I'll move the status bac

Re: Should JVM Args list in Admin UI Dashboard be sorted?

Personally I like having the arguments sorted. Usually when I look at this part of the Admin UI, I'm looking for the value of a particular CLI arg, and the alphabetical ordering makes it easy to jump right to the value I'm interested in. It's not often I'd come to the list and really care the exa

Re: Should JVM Args list in Admin UI Dashboard be sorted?

Works for me…. I don’t know that I have a strong reason to say that sorting is the way to go, and therefore can’t come up with a reason for a checkbox feature to do it either ;-). > On Nov 18, 2021, at 3:28 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > > It's been bugging me for a while that the JVM Args

Re: [Operator] [ANNOUNCE] Apache Solr Operator v0.5.0 released

Thanks Ciao, Vincenzo -- mobile: 3498513251 skype: free.dev > On 18 Nov 2021, at 18:05, Atita Arora wrote: > > You can join *kubernetes.slack.com > #solr-operator* channel. > > >> On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 9:45 AM Vincenzo D'Amore wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> is th

Re: [Operator] [ANNOUNCE] Apache Solr Operator v0.5.0 released

You can join *kubernetes.slack.com #solr-operator* channel. On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 9:45 AM Vincenzo D'Amore wrote: > Hi, > > is there a solr-operator dedicated mailing list? Or slack, or something > like that? > What should I do to take part in the project? > > On

Should JVM Args list in Admin UI Dashboard be sorted?

It's been bugging me for a while that the JVM Args list in the Solr Admin UI is sorted, not shown in the actual order the arguments appear on the command that started Solr. With the list of arguments sorted by the UI, you can't tell what the actual order is.  If you look at a process listing,

Re: Reference guide for 8.11

Ha ha, you actually wanted the 8.11 Ref Guide to be updated for 8.11? I had a few minutes today to look at the CHANGES for 8.11 and I’d like to mention a couple of things. I should have time to do this tomorrow so I will update the page and re-publish. Cassandra On Nov 17, 2021, 5:42 AM -0600,

Re: [VOTE] SIP-15 Node roles

I don’t want to start a fight here but the SIP process [1] doesn’t say anything about a vote passing by lazy consensus. It offers 2 options, lazy consensus via no further discussed objections OR a vote that must have 3 binding +1s: --- 5. When feedback iteration trails off on the DISCUSS thread,

Re: First class support for node roles

The SIP passed the voting phase. Thanks for all for the feedback and insights. Looking forward to your collaboration and reviews as we implement this. On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 9:42 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It's fine if we don't provide any ability for runtime

Re: [VOTE] SIP-15 Node roles

This SIP passes (mainly by lazy consensus) and we can now proceed to the implementation phase. Thanks to all who voted. On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 9:12 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Devs and Users, > > SIP-15 for first class support of node roles has been proposed.

Re: First class support for node roles

> It's fine if we don't provide any ability for runtime modification of roles at this time but I'm leery of precluding it in the future. In future, the necessity for such a facility can dictate our course of action. We cannot lay down rules cast in stone for functionality that we can't foresee yet

Re: First class support for node roles

Thanks Jan, I added both those points to the SIP document in the Notes section. On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 7:18 PM Jan Høydahl wrote: > 18. nov. 2021 kl. 01:43 skrev Gus Heck : > > > 2) Roles will not be checked by loading config from disk or caching disk > config in memory. (zk ONLY source of trut

Re: First class support for node roles

Code may want to know the role of other nodes (i.e. Someone just sent me a request to create a collection, where can I put it?). DRY... one source of truth is all I'm after. Someone changes the file on disk before restarting, we shouldn't see the change locally but not see it globally, etc. It's f

Re: [Operator] [ANNOUNCE] Apache Solr Operator v0.5.0 released

Hi, is there a solr-operator dedicated mailing list? Or slack, or something like that? What should I do to take part in the project? On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 4:58 PM Houston Putman wrote: > The Apache Solr PMC is pleased to announce the release of the Apache Solr > Operator v0.5.0. > > The Apach

Re: First class support for node roles

18. nov. 2021 kl. 01:43 skrev Gus Heck : > > 2) Roles will not be checked by loading config from disk or caching disk > config in memory. (zk ONLY source of truth) > It sounds a bit backward for a local node to first parse solr.node.roles, determine its local set of roles, then publish them to

Re: CoreContainer handlers/endpoints/APIs

On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 11:05 PM Jason Gerlowski wrote: > > I'm working with Nazerke to make it so that you can register these in > solr.xml SOLR-15782 > > Awesome, glad to hear you guys are looking at this and making > @Endpoint APIs a little more "first class"! > I think we should make it firs