Hello Solr committers,
The time has come for the next committers meeting.
It will take place on one of *Wednesday, May 10-12th*.
Please fill out what days/times work best for you here:
https://doodle.com/meeting/organize/id/erkqM2Ka
Note: This meeting is restricted to Solr committers, but the n
On 4/26/2022 2:53 PM, Gus Heck wrote:
I can't imagine anyone in a serious enterprise turning it on on
purpose... But I can imagine FUD arising from its existence. I'm not
in favor of any call home type functionality.
In order for it to even work, we would need infrastructure in place to
recei
I can't imagine anyone in a serious enterprise turning it on on purpose...
But I can imagine FUD arising from its existence. I'm not in favor of any
call home type functionality.
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 3:03 PM Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 4/26/22 12:06, Ishan Chattopadhyaya wrote:
> > > I wonder if
On 4/26/22 12:06, Ishan Chattopadhyaya wrote:
> I wonder if we should build in some kind of "call home" functionality
On principle, I would object to anything like this. It breaks the
trust. Makes users suspicious. Puts more onus on practitioners to vet
the releases for something sneaky.
I much
> I wonder if we should build in some kind of "call home" functionality
On principle, I would object to anything like this. It breaks the trust.
Makes users suspicious. Puts more onus on practitioners to vet the releases
for something sneaky.
I much prefer Marcus Eagan's proposal for a PMC driven s
I was shocked to discover https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14967
causes solr to violate one of it's most key precepts that zk is not
involved on every query.
In looking into this, I ran across this code:
https://github.com/apache/solr/blob/b218c177b8e3b387ada03acbad214a0c3bfe1443/solr/so
Yea, should be opt-in. What about a button in Admin UI that would call
/admin/info/system with some new param "?stats=true" and submit the resulting
JSON with some feature usage stats somewhere? However, the presence of some
handler or feature in config is not synonymous with it being used, and
On 4/26/22 07:42, David Smiley wrote:
I'm glad you raise the question here but definitely raise this on the
SOLR-14663 as well so that you get attention from pertinent folks
there. I wouldn't be surprised if some of our users have JIRA
accounts but don't subscribe to this list.
This idea is
I'm glad you raise the question here but definitely raise this on the
SOLR-14663 as well so that you get attention from pertinent folks there. I
wouldn't be surprised if some of our users have JIRA accounts but don't
subscribe to this list.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http:
Hi,
We are using this property so I think it would be good to keep this.
Best,
Andras
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 4:46 PM Eric Pugh
wrote:
> While looking at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16110 "Using
> Schema/Config API breaks the File-Upload of Config Set File”, I learned
> about th
Thanks Houston for lmost completing the release :)
Houston asked me to take the RM hat back for RC4.
Unless you guys are aware of other blockers, I'll try to spin RC4 soon.
Jan
> 16. apr. 2022 kl. 00:24 skrev Houston Putman :
>
> Ok, this is officially done. We can move onto RC4 as if RC3 ne
11 matches
Mail list logo
