It's been >72h since the vote was initiated and the result is:
+1 7 (6 binding)
0 0
-1 0
This vote has PASSED
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 1:11 PM Michael Gibney
wrote:
>
> Thanks for the nudge! I was planning on followup steps this evening
> (considering the vote passed!). Official followup sh
: I wish the FieldCache was explicitly opt-in. Hossman made inroads into
: this by adding a feature where you can disable it on a per-field basis but
: I think we overall forgot to set this as a new default in a major release.
All the pieces are there -- there just wasn't much of a push to chan
Thanks for the nudge! I was planning on followup steps this evening
(considering the vote passed!). Official followup shortly.
Michael
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 11:03 AM Houston Putman wrote:
>
> Any update on the vote Michael?
>
> - Houston
>
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 5:50 PM Anshum Gupta wrote:
We already have a precedent of using Confluence for meeting notes. Here's
the last one:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/2022-05-10+Meeting+notes
An email that occurs per meeting would be good to remind folks that there's
about to be another meeting within a day or two, say. It s
Awesome - sounds there's definitely some general interest. (Though the
details need some hashing out.)
> I'm wondering if bi-weekly is a bit ambitious?
It might be. Maybe monthly is a better starting point. My hope was
that making the meetings reasonably frequent would cut down on the
pressure
Any update on the vote Michael?
- Houston
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 5:50 PM Anshum Gupta wrote:
> I had the following tests fail consistently on my machine
>
> org.apache.solr.prometheus.exporter.SolrExporterIntegrationTest.jvmMetrics
> (:solr:prometheus-exporter)
>
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj
Hi,
You can try using CloudLegacySolrClient as a start, which is exactly like in
8.x. But you'll need to figure out SSL with Http2SolrClient sooner or later
since it is deprecated.
Jan
> 24. jan. 2023 kl. 12:43 skrev Keerthi Turakapalli
> :
>
> Hi,
>
> In solr8.11.2 we were using the below
> We can set it up as a recurrent meeting, inviting all the committers as
> optional (but also open to contributors that want to join?)
I'm not a committer, but I'd be interested as well.
I would think we'd want it as inclusive as possible. In other projects, I've
seen similar ideas get locked
Hi,
In solr8.11.2 we were using the below code where the HttpClient object is
created with SSLContextFactory to connect to ssl enabled solr.
Code Snippet using solr 8.11.2:
builder = new
CloudSolrClient.Builder(Collections.singletonList(mServerDetails.getZookeeperUrl()),
Optional.empty())
Even if we can get together once a month, that should be great.
Let's keep a google sheets to fill up items that we need to discuss . We
can just pick up the top items to discuss?
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 9:17 PM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> Kudos for the initiative. Light-weight is always good, and hig
It's a great idea Jason!
We can set it up as a recurrent meeting, inviting all the committers as
optional (but also open to contributors that want to join?)
In this way when it's on the calendar, each contributor can decide when to
come and when not based on their availability.
If we leave the des
Kudos for the initiative. Light-weight is always good, and high frequency makes
it more light weight..
I'm wondering if bi-weekly is a bit ambitious? Who will host them all? While no
agenda is low-maintenance, it also makes it hard for community members to
choose which meetings they want to att
12 matches
Mail list logo
