default".
> >
> > I don't know if this thread is the best place to discuss it but having
> > the PRS znode be ephemeral would be really beneficial to dramatically
> > strengthen the goals of PRS by efficiently handling restarts. No need
> > to mark a node's replicas
We (Fullstory) have been running PRS for quite a while now with great
stability and a huge performance benefit for us particularly in terms of
cluster restarts. That said, our use case certainly isn't everyone's use
case. We run large clusters with lots of cores so we get a particular
benefit. My
?
>
> Thanks for looking at this!
>
>
>
> > On Feb 29, 2024, at 12:29 PM, Justin Sweeney
> wrote:
> >
> > I actually think that use case should just work since the SolrZkClient
> can
> > already handle compressed state.json, assuming you are just using the
>
I actually think that use case should just work since the SolrZkClient can
already handle compressed state.json, assuming you are just using the
default ZLib implementation of compression. When getting data it looks like
the ZkCpTool calls SolrZkClient.getData() which is able to check if the
data
o I don't know if it's related to local changes (we run a fork of upstream
> SolrCloud) or if it's a general problem.
> In any case, if PRS is modified to use EPHEMERAL ZK nodes, indeed ZK
> session expiration is something to be careful with.
>
> Ilan
>
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2023
Hey Ilan, curious if you have tried PRS in your implementation or not
at this point and what your experience has been if you have tried it?
I believe PRS currently publishes DOWNNODE messages to overseer, but
they are essentially a no-op by the overseer so they have very little
impact. We are
+1 on this SIP and a POC would make sense. I think it could be
valuable to update the Motivation section with the anticipated value
provided by this SIP, i.e. reduced code maintenance, removing brittle
home-grown interfaces, etc. Most of my IOC/DI experience is with
Spring and Dagger seems like a
Congrats Alex and welcome!
On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 8:59 AM Eric Pugh
wrote:
>
> Awesome Alex! Really enjoyed working with you so far….
>
> > On Aug 2, 2023, at 8:54 AM, Mike Drob wrote:
> >
> > Welcome and congratulations!
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 8:47 AM David Smiley
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
The Solr PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 9.2.1.
Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform from
the Apache Solr project. Its major features include powerful full-text
search, hit highlighting, faceted search, dynamic clustering, database
It's been >72h since the vote was initiated and the result is:
+1 6 (5 binding)
0 0
-1 0
This vote has PASSED
as the proposed change that
> >>>> Ishan
> >>>> speaks of is an "improvement" that helps security and is not a
> >>>> bug/vulnerability being fixed. It would also bring a backwards
> >>>> compatibility change. So please do continue with this long
This definitely sounds very interesting and if we could abstract it away
from AWS specifically then even better. I think there are a lot of
advantages with an approach like this as you've mentioned. At FullStory we
are planning to get into some experiments using GCP Local SSDs and Google
Cloud
> Joel Bernstein
> > > http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 1:23 PM Jan Høydahl
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (binding)
> > > >
> > > > SUCCESS! [0:38:44.920838]
> >
ast 72 hours i.e. until 2023-04-30 15:00 UTC.
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 12:38 PM Justin Sweeney
wrote:
> Yup, let's wait in that case. I didn't realize it would fail since I had
> temporarily added my key locally to be able to
Yup, I commented on the ticket. I was able to push today. I’ll update the
release vote thread in the morning.
On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 6:35 PM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> I believe it should be fixed now?
>
> Jan Høydahl
>
> > 26. apr. 2023 kl. 15:32 skrev Justin Sweeney >
slack.
> If this is not unblocked by tonight, I'm happy to commit your public key
> for you, I see your key ID 7AA80271 in
> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/
>
> Jan
>
> > 26. apr. 2023 kl. 14:53 skrev Justin Sweeney >:
> >
> > Looks like
> https://is
gt; > > > Jan
> > > > >
> > > > > > 21. apr. 2023 kl. 01:01 skrev Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
> > > > > ichattopadhy...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Vote and 3 days of wait!? This whole Apache proc
wrote:
> Hey Justin,
>
> Should we wait to run this until after your GPG key is in
> https://downloads.apache.org/solr/KEYS?
>
> The smoketester fails for me because it can't find your key.
>
> - Houston
>
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 12:20 PM Justin Sweeney <
>
Please vote for release candidate 1 for Solr 9.2.1
The artifacts can be downloaded from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.2.1-RC1-rev-a4c64ab6a2a270ca69c28c706dabb2927ed8a7c2
You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
python3 -u
sensible thing.
> >
> > On Fri, 21 Apr, 2023, 7:56 pm Justin Sweeney, <
> justin.sweene...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Just to close the loop on this, should I kick off a vote as a new
> thread to
> >> the dev group or should that be kicked
wentieth century. If such a vote is a strict
> > > necessity, I think we should also get a vote on whether to stick with
> > > Apache.
> > >
> > > On Fri, 21 Apr, 2023, 3:52 am Justin Sweeney, <
> > justin.sweene...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
&g
t allow it, so Solr doesn't have it
> > enabled now.
> >
> > As per the JIRA infra can do this. Should we get a PMC vote on this?
> >
> > - Houston
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 4:06 PM Houston Putman
> wrote:
> >
> >> I commented.
>
re, so I’d just proceed with the release
> and
> >> ask again if it becomes a problem. Non-pmc committers have certainly
> been
> >> RM before.
> >>
> >> Jan Høydahl
> >>
> >>> 20. apr. 2023 kl. 17:19 skrev Justin Sweeney <
> justin.swee
can open an Infra ticket to change permissions, but it will
likely require some approvals beyond myself.
Justin
On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 10:21 AM Justin Sweeney
wrote:
> Yup, feel free to go ahead and merge that in.
>
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 10:18 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
&g
Ishan
>
> On Thu, 20 Apr 2023 at 19:37, Justin Sweeney
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for merging that, I'm just getting started along the release
> > process, had to get a gpg key setup but should be moving today.
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 11:03 AM Jan Høydahl
&g
's a good one to include.
> >
> > - Houston
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 7:37 AM Jan Høydahl
> wrote:
> >
> >> Is there still time to back-port
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16755 ?
> >>
> >&g
e release. There are
> initial steps that are meant to be done days before the release is created.
>
> There will be two particular snags since you aren't a PMC member, but they
> will come up early and the releaseWizard will prompt you to address them.
>
> If you have any questions
+1 If you need a volunteer to execute the release, I can volunteer to do
that next week. Are there docs available for the release process as it'd be
my first time through?
Justin
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 12:10 PM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> +1
>
> Jan
>
> > 11. apr. 2023 kl. 15:51 skrev Houston Putman
Congratulations Marcus!
On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 12:48 PM Gus Heck wrote:
> Congratulations and Welcome!
>
> On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 10:54 AM Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
>
> > Welcome, Marcus!
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 7:31 AM Marcus Eagan
> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks everyone!
> > >
> > > Bio
Congrats David, well deserved!
On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 1:05 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Congrats David!
>
> On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 at 22:34, Houston Putman wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Solr has had quite a year, with a major release and many cool new
> >
t;
> >>> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> My biggest concern with widespread code changes, like the effort to
> >> format
> >>>> the entire codebase or to suppress warnings etc in the past, is that
> >>>> r
+1 If we do so, I'd suggest we also add that to the Contributing docs
somewhere so it is readily apparent for new contributors:
https://github.com/apache/solr/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md.
On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 3:29 AM Bruno Roustant
wrote:
> +1
> I find that a standard is more productive because
Welcome Andy!
On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 11:05 AM Houston Putman wrote:
> Welcome Andy!
>
> - Houston
>
> On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 7:31 AM Jason Gerlowski
> wrote:
>
> > Welcome Andy, and congratulations!
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 6:16 AM Jan Høydahl
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > >
Welcome Colvin!
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 6:27 AM Alessandro Benedetti
wrote:
> Welcome on board Colvin!
> --
> *Alessandro Benedetti*
> Director @ Sease Ltd.
> *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
> *Apache Solr PMC Member*
>
> e-mail: a.benede...@sease.io
>
>
> *Sease* -
.
Justin
On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 2:00 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm pleased to announce that Justin Sweeney has accepted the PMC's
> invitation to become a committer.
>
> Justin, the tradition is that new committers introduce t
Personally I think this would be great, it'd be nice to connect with others
in the community and hear more about pain points, new ideas, etc. One
suggestion is it might be useful to have a running Google Doc that people
can add items into for discussion at future meetings. This could help
provide
Hi all,
ZkStateReader (
https://github.com/apache/solr/blob/main/solr/solrj-zookeeper/src/java/org/apache/solr/common/cloud/ZkStateReader.java)
is a complicated class with thousands of lines and numerous inner classes.
This makes approaching this class overly complex. I was recently
investigating
Hey all,
I'm a long time Solr user/developer, but only recently joined the dev
mailing list for Solr so it is a pleasure to interact with you all.
We, at FullStory, working with Ishan and Noble, sponsored the Per Replica
State implementation and are using it currently. We are running large
38 matches
Mail list logo
