This was an absolute monster, but I’m happy to see the community get out a
release that is more stable, scalable, flexible, and secure.
Big accomplishment. Thank you all for your service.
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:00 PM David Smiley wrote:
> Woohoo!
>
> ~ David Smiley
> Apache Lucene/Solr Sear
Woohoo!
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 11:09 AM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> It's been >72h since the vote was initiated and the result is:
>
> +1 11 (9 binding)
> 0 0
> -1 0
>
> This vote has PASSED
>
> I'll wait
*super efforts
On Tue, 10 May, 2022, 10:41 pm Ishan Chattopadhyaya, <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Heartfelt thanks for your support efforts, Jan and Houston!
>
> On Tue, 10 May, 2022, 8:39 pm Jan Høydahl, wrote:
>
>> It's been >72h since the vote was initiated and the result is:
>>
>> +1
Heartfelt thanks for your support efforts, Jan and Houston!
On Tue, 10 May, 2022, 8:39 pm Jan Høydahl, wrote:
> It's been >72h since the vote was initiated and the result is:
>
> +1 11 (9 binding)
> 0 0
> -1 0
>
> This vote has PASSED
>
> I'll wait until tomorrow with publishing the artifac
It's been >72h since the vote was initiated and the result is:
+1 11 (9 binding)
0 0
-1 0
This vote has PASSED
I'll wait until tomorrow with publishing the artifacts and announcing the
release, to allow some latest edits to RefGuide.
Congrats!
Jan
> 5. mai 2022 kl. 09:48 skrev Jan Høyd
Michael - can you file a JIRA issue with details of the environment and
failure that you saw? Happy to take a look at it once we know what the
problem is.
On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 3:55 PM Michael Gibney
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> SUCCESS! [0:49:30.542503]
>
> I ran the smoketester, but did not
+1 (binding)
SUCCESS! [0:56:17.682093]
Kevin Risden
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 3:34 AM Marcus Eagan wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Smoke test...
>
> SUCCESS! [1:21:36.996264]
>
> I also checked a few areas (admin actions and security manager) in case
> there were issues. No issues on my side.
>
>
+1 (non-binding)
Smoke test...
SUCCESS! [1:21:36.996264]
I also checked a few areas (admin actions and security manager) in case
there were issues. No issues on my side.
Excited to pitch in on a few areas in SOLR version 9.
Nice work all, especially the folks driving this release.
On Mon, M
+1 (binding)
Smoke tester is happy: SUCCESS! [0:53:32.398623]
Tested sample index/searching app, tested custom shard handler for a bug
fix.
On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 12:49 AM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> Please vote for release candidate 5 for Solr 9.0.0
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>
> htt
+1 (non-binding)
SUCCESS! [0:49:30.542503]
I ran the smoketester, but did not do any manual testing.
It may be worth noting: I struggled a bit to get the integration tests to
run on Alpine Linux (with the BusyBox version of `ps`) -- solved by `apk
add procps`. It's possible that this would not b
+1 (binding)
SUCCESS! [0:38:46.406539]
Tested:
- Built the official docker image
- Local and S3 backups
- Solr Operator integration - smoke tester
- Integration with SolrJ 8.10
The smoketester failed once, but just due to threadleak issues.
- Houston
On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 8:59 A
+1 (binding)
SUCCESS! [0:45:47.169811]
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 8:58 AM Jason Gerlowski
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> SUCCESS! [1:02:41.827601]
>
> Ran the smoketester and did some manual tests for increment
+1 (binding)
SUCCESS! [1:02:41.827601]
Ran the smoketester and did some manual tests for incremental backups.
On Sat, May 7, 2022 at 12:56 PM Joel Bernstein wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> SUCCESS! [0:50:47.511601]
>
>
>
> Joel Bernstein
> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>
>
> On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 1
+1 (binding)
SUCCESS! [0:50:47.511601]
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 11:26 AM Eric Pugh
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> SUCCESS! [1:05:27.496955]
>
> On May 6, 2022, at 11:16 AM, Timothy Potter wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> SUCCESS! [0:47:39.581876]
>
> Just r
+1 (binding)
SUCCESS! [1:05:27.496955]
> On May 6, 2022, at 11:16 AM, Timothy Potter wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> SUCCESS! [0:47:39.581876]
>
> Just ran the smoke tester for this one, didn't have time to do any
> other manual tests.
>
> On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 1:47 PM Mike Drob wrote:
>>
>>
+1 (binding)
SUCCESS! [0:47:39.581876]
Just ran the smoke tester for this one, didn't have time to do any
other manual tests.
On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 1:47 PM Mike Drob wrote:
>
> [INFO] There was an issue with SOLR-16133 that caused the smoke tester to
> fail with gpg errors on macOS. That chan
[INFO] There was an issue with SOLR-16133 that caused the smoke tester to
fail with gpg errors on macOS. That change has been reverted from
branch_9_0 and if you run into it, please try fetching the latest changes
and running the smoke tester command again.
On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 2:48 AM Jan Høyda
Please vote for release candidate 5 for Solr 9.0.0
The artifacts can be downloaded from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.0.0-RC5-rev-a4eb7aa123dc53f8dac74d80b66a490f2d6b4a26
You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.
18 matches
Mail list logo
