http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3804
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-23 17:01 ---
Actually, it does add the X-Languages header correctly, it just doesn't set
the _LANGUAGES_ config file tag to the same thing.
--- You are receiving this
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3814
Summary: ALL_TRUSTED
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.0.0
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Rules
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3804
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-23 16:54 ---
This was the change. The typo was there when it was first entered
-
r6768 | jm | 2004-02-19 20:34:09 +1300 (Thu, 19 Feb 2004) | 1 line
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3530
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-23 16:36 ---
Subject: Re: ALL_TRUSTED false positive
We should not be trusting headers because of a failure to parse. That's
the greater bug, I think.
--- You are r
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3813
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-23 16:25 ---
the log-to-file switch should still work.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3813
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-23 16:22 ---
Even if there are deficiencies in the Windows Event Log, that is the standard
way for service to log things. It would be a real can of worms to try to invent
somet
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3813
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-23 16:02 ---
Would it be possible to provide other logging means for the Win32 folks? I
find it tedious to check System Event logs in Windows, I very much dislike them.
But
Any chance you could send me the two changed files, from some reason
patch.exe (win32) fails here..
TIA
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 7:08 PM
To: dev@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: [Bug 3812] Received header pars
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3540
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3801
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|MUAs handle lack of newline |[review] MUAs handle lack of
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3801
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-23 15:12 ---
Created an attachment (id=2366)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2366&action=view)
patch as committed to 3.1
this passes "make test" and s
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3801
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|3.1.0 |3.0.1
--- Additional Comment
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3812
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-23 14:59 ---
thx Avi, hadn't spotted that
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3812
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additi
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3792
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3530
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-23 14:53 ---
TBH, I was expecting to hear some bug reports of SA not parsing some people's
Received headers correctly. Being able to parse those headers is essential for
a num
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3813
Summary: RFE: Better packaging for a Windows installable version
Product: Spamassassin
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: enhan
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3810
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-23 14:21 ---
Created an attachment (id=2365)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2365&action=view)
Same test spam email manually run through spamc/spamd
I
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3810
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-23 14:20 ---
Created an attachment (id=2364)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2364&action=view)
spam email after delivery through spamass-milter and sen
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3810
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-23 14:19 ---
Created an attachment (id=2363)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2363&action=view)
test email
This is simple test spam email
--- Yo
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3806
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-23 14:11 ---
So they just noticed a few days ago. I just tried editing Long.pm found in
Sys-Hostname-Long-1.2/lib/Sys/Hostname and also in
Sys-Hostname-Long-1.2/blib/lib/Sys/H
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3805
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|Future |3.1.0
--- Additional Comment
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3809
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-23 14:02 ---
Subject: Re: New: Rewrite Subject when no Subject is present
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 06:44:47AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> As it seems there are more and
Sidney writes:
> I tried to do svn blame PerMsgStatus.pm and svn appeared to just hang with no
> output. Is there a trick to finding out the history of this line?
"svn blame" is very very slow. You have to wait a very very long time.
This is fixed in Subversion 1.1.
Daniel
--
Daniel Quinlan
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3530
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-23 13:48 ---
AFAIK, ALL_TRUSTED fires when it can't find the client IP in the Received:
header. I had this problem as well because SpamAssassin couldn't parse the
correct in
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3804
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |minor
Priority|P2
Any chance you could send me the two changed files, from some reason
patch.exe (win32) fails here..
TIA
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 7:08 PM
To: dev@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: [Bug 3812] Received header pars
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3806
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-23 12:47 ---
Subject: Re: Build scripts renames host to --fqdn when run as root
http://rt.cpan.org/NoAuth/Bug.html?id=7717
Michael
--- You are receiving this mail b
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3806
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-23 12:43 ---
Well, I am using perl out of the box. I greped for fqdn in the source and did
not find '--fqdn' anywhere. Ah, there it is under the cpan stuff. I have v1.2
of S
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3530
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-23 12:30 ---
Chiming in with Al, I've got some folks who've talked to me about their SA 3
setups, and everything works great.except ALL_TRUSTED is firing on nearly
everyt
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3806
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-23 12:25 ---
dnsbl.t and spf.t? I think it's a bug in Sys::Hostname::Long, being called from
Net::DNS in that case. unfortunately there's nothing we can do about it in SA!
h
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3808
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-23 12:21 ---
'I would be more in favor of adding a plugin interface for logging as
long as the performance impact was minimal.'
yeah, actually, that's what I was suggesting ;)
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3810
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-23 11:23 ---
Subject: Re: After installing 3.0.0 sieve not working on X-Spam headers
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 11:15:57AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> --- Additiona
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3806
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-23 11:21 ---
Subject: Re: Build scripts renames host to --fqdn when run as root
Sys::Hostname::Long has this code on my system (looks like v1.0):
# Default f
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3810
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-23 11:15 ---
I am also using spamass-milter-0.2 but that hasn't changed between versions so
it is probably not at falt.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3806
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-23 11:05 ---
The hostname is changed during test t/dnsbl and again during t/spf. Now if I
run make test as a normal user I get the following output during these tests:
t/dnsbl
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3810
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-23 10:44 ---
Subject: Re: After installing 3.0.0 sieve not working on X-Spam headers
Looks like there is an extra line inserted in the headers, which
probably causes your fil
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3808
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-23 10:16 ---
Subject: Re: New: Code to aid in Spamd statistics
> Per Justin Mason's suggestion, I am opening this "bug" for spamd to be
> able to write to a statistics file.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3812
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|Future |3.0.1
--- You are receivin
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3812
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-23 10:08 ---
Created an attachment (id=2362)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2362&action=view)
fix
this patch does the following:
1. collects all reg
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3812
Summary: Received header parser gets SMTPSVC headers wrong
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.0.0
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Pri
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3806
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-23 08:53 ---
I wonder if this could be a perl problem. I can find the lines
=item ($hostname, $domain) = split_domain ($fqdn)
=item $domain = trim_domain($fqdn)
in lib/Mail/Sp
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3806
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-23 09:10 ---
How is SA installed on Solaris? CPAN? Or just make install? This looks like it's
something outside SA that's getting stroked by the SA installation procedure.
-
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3810
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-23 09:30 ---
Created an attachment (id=2361)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2361&action=view)
sample spam with headers
The following 2 tests were mis
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3811
Summary: Makefile.PL error
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.0.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: spa
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3810
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-23 08:24 ---
Will you please attach (via the "Create a New Attachement" link) a sample spam
(including all headers added by spamassassin) that was missed.
--- You are re
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3806
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-23 08:21 ---
Which build script?
I just did a find . | xargs grep fqdn and couldn't find anything obvious.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3806
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-23 07:56 ---
So that is how that happened!! I built and tested SpamAssassin as a regular
user, but then re-ran make test as root to see if the 'uname: not super user'
message
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3810
Summary: After installing 3.0.0 sieve not working on X-Spam
headers
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.0.0
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Sev
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3605
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3809
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3809
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-23 07:00 ---
please see bug 3605 for my patch. i am in agreement with you that spam without
subject header should have an subject line added, and that is what my patch
does.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3809
Summary: Rewrite Subject when no Subject is present
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.0.0
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority:
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3808
Summary: Code to aid in Spamd statistics
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.0.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Co
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3807
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3807
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-23 05:19 ---
Subject: Re: New: Use of inherited AUTOLOAD for non-method
Digest::SHA1::sha1_hex() is deprecated
Do you have Digest::SHA1 installed? Can perl find it?
Please
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3807
Summary: Use of inherited AUTOLOAD for non-method
Digest::SHA1::sha1_hex() is deprecated
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.0.0
Platform: PC
OS/Version: FreeBSD
St
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3805
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-23 03:55 ---
Looking at the blocklist hits:
http://www.surbl.org/dns-queries.blocklist.counts.txt and DNS server traffic:
http://nmrl.kconline.com/rbldnsd/ there are a lot more
> (Note: someone may want to address
> [http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=122734&cid=10320250 these
> complaints] about this document.)
I did post a response in
http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=122734&cid=10325272 [Anyone got
some spare mod points? :-) ].
There is one issue I missed a
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3806
Summary: Build scripts renames host to --fqdn when run as root
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.0.0
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Solaris
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
[Please post follow ups to the SURBL discuss list or to me.]
One of the distinct data sources currently feeding into
ws.surbl.org includes data from Joe Wein and Raymond Dijkxhoorn
with his colleagues at Prolocation. Raymond and Prolocation
are currently processing more than 300,000 potential spa
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3805
Summary: RFE: Manual whitelist for URIDNSBL lookups
Product: Spamassassin
Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
Platform: All
URL: http://www.surbl.org/dns-queries.whitelist.counts.t
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3804
Summary: _LANGUAGES_ tag does not get set properly
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.0.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3803
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P5 |P2
--- You are receiving t
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3803
Summary: logo contest output needed
Product: Spamassassin
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3776
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-22 19:17 ---
This is rough without an example. Would it be possible to modify whatever is
calling spamd (exiscan-acl?) to log something that identifies the each message,
such a
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3791
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-22 18:37 ---
Created an attachment (id=2360)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2360&action=view)
perl regexp for received.pm
if (/\[XMail [^\]]+Server\]
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3675
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-22 17:16 ---
Subject: Re: [review] pick a project logo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
>
> >> then we can start making t-shirts ;)
>
> Something nicer that t-shirts, please
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
>
> >> then we can start making t-shirts ;)
>
> Something nicer that t-shirts, please. I have too many white
> technology-related t-shirts.
>
Denim shirts are nice
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3675
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-22 17:01 ---
Subject: Re: [review] pick a project logo
On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 04:58:43PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Either way, the logo might not easily work as a tr
70 matches
Mail list logo
