http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-22 15:34 ---
hmm. what about character sets? is everyone using the US codepage?
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or a
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-22 14:12 ---
It looks like spamd thinks everything is ok, but spamc is getting in error in
the socket connection. 76 is, as you said, "remote error in protocol" which I
see is
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3771
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #2474 is|0 |1
obsolete|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hmm. even better, a web form ;)
- --j.
- --- Forwarded Message
> Date:Fri, 22 Oct 2004 15:58:49 +0100
> From:Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Andy Lester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cc: perl5 Porters
> Subject: Re: When did
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
nifty!
- --- Forwarded Message
> Date:Fri, 22 Oct 2004 08:59:34 -0500
> From:Andy Lester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: perl5 Porters
> Subject: When did that module first become core?
>
> > What first perl version this method is availa
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-22 11:55 ---
Well I reinstalled Cygwin and SA using the latest CVS build, still having the
same problem.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the as
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-22 10:07 ---
Just tried the latest CVS build I got the following results:
D:\ESA>zspamc-alt2 -x < zs2.out > zs2a.out
failed sanity check, 109044 bytes claimed, 33721 bytes see
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3767
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-22 08:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=2477)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2477&action=view)
SQL AWL username override against 3.0.0 release
Adds si
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3833
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-22 06:57 ---
Try changing line 152 of that file from:
$text .= "$row[0]\t$row[1]\n";
to:
$text .= "$row[0]\t$row[1]\n" if (defined($row[0]) && defined($row[1]));
I don't ha
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3915
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-22 06:57 ---
hmm, maybe. I have cleaned my spamfolder, so I can't say if you're right or
wrong.
I'll wait for such accident and check if emails without BAYES has no equivale
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-22 05:44 ---
Created an attachment (id=2476)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2476&action=view)
my spamc.exe
Here is the spamc from my cygwin build, in
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-22 05:42 ---
Created an attachment (id=2475)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2475&action=view)
same zs2.out sample with resultant zs2a.out and Debug fr
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3915
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-22 05:37 ---
The message isn't being auto-learned the first time through, is it? This would
explain bayes assigning a probability the second time through, since it would
then
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3771
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #2335 is|0 |1
obsolete|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-21 21:24 ---
My initial test usaing zs2.out did not reproduce the problem, using 3.01 svn
branch and running spamc and spamd under Cygwin.
I'll have to check it more thoroughl
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-21 21:06 ---
Created an attachment (id=2473)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2473&action=view)
One more sample
The sample that I just attached I tried
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-21 20:42 ---
As a test I tried converting a test message, using a DOS2UNIX utility, before
sending it to SpamD. I got the same results. SpamD is only return a portion
of th
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-21 20:33 ---
I submitted a copy of the samples as a zipped file. Most messages are being
properly processed only a small percentage are having this problem. I have
noticed
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-21 20:27 ---
Created an attachment (id=2472)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2472&action=view)
Zipped copy of attachment samples
--- You are re
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-21 19:55 ---
Can you check if it has anything to do with the mail message having DOS vs unix
newlines? That would be hidden in the attachments you posted unless you zipped
them
Hey, what the heck, it's a voting day (I got my absentee ballot sent off
today)
+1
-- sidney
For the record:
+1
That should do it.
--
Daniel Quinlan ApacheCon! 13-17 November (3 SpamAssassin
http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/ http://www.apachecon.com/ sessions & more)
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-21 19:03 ---
I have attached four messages that recieved this error.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching t
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-21 19:03 ---
Created an attachment (id=2471)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2471&action=view)
Sample #4
--- You are receiving this mail becaus
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-21 19:02 ---
Created an attachment (id=2470)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2470&action=view)
Sample #3
--- You are receiving this mail becaus
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-21 19:02 ---
Created an attachment (id=2469)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2469&action=view)
Sample#2
--- You are receiving this mail because
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
Summary: SpamC is reporting "failed sanity check" on some
messages
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.0.0
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows 2000
Status: NEW
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 06:07:57PM -0700, Dan Quinlan wrote:
> I propose we release SpamAssassin 3.0.1. All bugs are closed now.
+1
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"What part of 'no' don't you understand? Is it the 'N', or the 'Zero'?"
- Quotes from Induhviduals, Dilbert Newsletter 55
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Quinlan writes:
> I propose we release SpamAssassin 3.0.1. All bugs are closed now.
+1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh CVS
iD8DBQFBeGTKMJF5cimLx9ARAnavAJ9hJN088VrH7LM1eHiPXr9DJ7xeLACght6V
3dqofd7
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3916
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-21 18:12 ---
+1
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
I propose we release SpamAssassin 3.0.1. All bugs are closed now.
Daniel
--
Daniel Quinlan ApacheCon! 13-17 November (3 SpamAssassin
http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/ http://www.apachecon.com/ sessions & more)
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3916
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|3.0.1 |3.1.0
--- Additional Comment
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3916
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-21 18:06 ---
Committed revision 55292.
(to 3.0 branch)
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3915
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-21 18:05 ---
Problem is, that I cannot reproduce bug by hand. The same message, which arrives
without BAYES test, processed again behaves properly. So cause is unknown for me
n
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3916
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-21 17:22 ---
+1
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3916
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|Future |3.0.1
--- Additional Comment
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3916
Summary: deprecate RCVD_IN_RFC_IPWHOIS
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.0.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P1
Compo
37 matches
Mail list logo