Re: ClamAV, phishing, and our corpora

2005-01-08 Thread Nix
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, Daniel Quinlan moaned: > ClamAV is now marking phishing messages as virus-positive. > > I think it's a bit ludicrous to consider phishing messages as viruses > rather than spam -- they share far more traits with spam than viruses, I Agreed. Anyone running the clamav-milter mi

[Bug 4070] New: Spam Reporting: Providing "spam category" via command line

2005-01-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4070 Summary: Spam Reporting: Providing "spam category" via command line Product: Spamassassin Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW

[Bug 4069] New: Spam Reporting: Getting tests results from removed markup

2005-01-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4069 Summary: Spam Reporting: Getting tests results from removed markup Product: Spamassassin Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW

[Bug 4052] SpamAssassin rules file: Chinese subject and body tests

2005-01-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4052 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-08 06:36 --- Hi, two questions: 1. Each rule in SpamAssasin have 4 scores. How does SpamAssassin set the last 3 scores ? 2. If the last 3 scores are absent, will SpamAssass

[Bug 3998] Add support for Habeas v2

2005-01-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3998 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-08 03:46 --- Actually, after looking a bit more, the current levels don't really seem to be following any convention at all. Bonded Sender has a -4.3 which is a holdover from

[Bug 3998] Add support for Habeas v2

2005-01-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3998 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-08 03:38 --- -1 the negative bonuses are excessive and inconsistent with our current levels As I understand it, our current levels are: -16 for closed-loop opt-in -8 for

[Bug 3983] [review] adopt Apache preforking algorithm

2005-01-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3983 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-07 21:58 --- Subject: Re: [review] adopt Apache preforking algorithm On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 09:54:09PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > is anyone else running this without

[Bug 3983] [review] adopt Apache preforking algorithm

2005-01-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3983 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-07 21:54 --- i have this running on many systems and its working great. however, i have one that is a problem, and it really the only oddball out of the bunch. its a dual hyp

[Bug 4048] auth_ident() generates warning

2005-01-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4048 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-07 19:51 --- Created an attachment (id=2593) --> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2593&action=view) checks to see if $ident_username is defined ---

Re: svn commit: r124477 - /spamassassin/trunk/lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/EvalTests.pm /spamassassin/trunk/rules/20_body_tests.cf /spamassassin/trunk/rules/70_testing.cf

2005-01-08 Thread Loren Wilton
>> oh good, so you've changed your mind since >> http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3781#c3 then ;) >Somewhat. I still think it should be a plugin. There's a problem with plugins I hadn't realized when they were originally being advertized as the universal solution to oddball rul

[Bug 4064] Spamcop has max reporting size

2005-01-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4064 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #2591 is|0 |1 obsolete|

[Bug 4064] Spamcop has max reporting size

2005-01-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4064 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-07 19:08 --- Created an attachment (id=2591) --> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2591&action=view) implements config option --- You are receiving t

[Bug 4068] New: SpamAssassin doesn't follow RFCs 822, 2045, and 2046

2005-01-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4068 Summary: SpamAssassin doesn't follow RFCs 822, 2045, and 2046 Product: Spamassassin Version: 2.64 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal

Re: svn commit: r124477 - /spamassassin/trunk/lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/EvalTests.pm /spamassassin/trunk/rules/20_body_tests.cf /spamassassin/trunk/rules/70_testing.cf

2005-01-08 Thread Daniel Quinlan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason) writes: > oh good, so you've changed your mind since > http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3781#c3 then ;) Somewhat. I still think it should be a plugin. Daniel -- Daniel Quinlan http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/

[Bug 4066] [ignore] test bug for needsmc functionality

2005-01-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4066 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-07 16:45 --- NEEDSMC --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

[Bug 4066] [ignore] test bug for needsmc functionality

2005-01-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4066 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-07 16:45 --- this one should fail: header BORKED /foo/bar/baz/i --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching th

[Bug 3781] There should be a rule type for mime part headers

2005-01-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3781 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-07 16:08 --- Subject: Re: There should be a rule type for mime part headers > this is now more important, as anti-spam rules are being found that *do* work > based on the MIM