Invisible:
gqthcgcnlaskpetjkmqhtudkpekfnctpeoxqqkosgfjxpensmuqdpsctfysudrjcqbracbccq
If that invisible text is/could be made available for tests, it would be
better if it reatined spaces between the various pieces that had been
extracted from the message. In this case it is all garbage, but that
On 2.64 those show up as mailto: URIs. Probably getting fed in. However,
many of them seem to be completely bogus host names, at least when the image
is included in the message. As it often is.
Loren
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 05:00:10PM -0600, Michael Parker wrote:
> For my bayes benchmark it's also learning about 70k more tokens for
> 4000 msgs than we were learning before, and have been for the past
> several months.
>
> Anyone have any ideas?
Yeah... In short, 3.1 pre r157460 was completely
Howdy,
I just saw a 30-40% increase in processing time for sa-learn and
general scanning when I installed r157460.
For my bayes benchmark it's also learning about 70k more tokens for
4000 msgs than we were learning before, and have been for the past
several months.
Anyone have any ideas?
Michae
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 06:31:17AM -0800, Jeff Chan wrote:
> We may want to consider the ability to check IMGs against SURBLs:
Assuming you mean domains from IMG tags, we already do. :)
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"I'm going to eat chocolate 'til I barf!"
--Ralph Wiggum
Ba
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3185
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-15 14:32 ---
oh, and if it is reproducable in 3.0/3.1, please attach (via the web interface)
a sample message and configuration which shows the issue.
--- You are receiv
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3185
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-15 14:31 ---
Looking at the 3.0/3.1 code, whitelist addresses (whole) are case insensitive,
unless I'm missing something.
Is this reproducable in 3.0/3.1 or just 2.x?
-
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3185
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Addi
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3983
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-15 10:24 ---
Could the patch submitted in Bug 4189 be the fix for the problems seen in
comment 44 through comment 55?
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
Yo
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3661
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-15 09:38 ---
'Even worse would be "body FOO blah" followed by a TFLAGS to change what the
test was really looking at...'
yeah, agreed, that tflags idea is right out. tflags
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4040
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
And the tracking beacon domain belongs to Ralsky:
http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL22475
http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL23426
Jeff C.
We may want to consider the ability to check IMGs against SURBLs:
Jeff C.
__
Received: (qmail 80480 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2005 13:55:55 -
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
by m27.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 15 Mar 2005 13:55:55 -
Received: from unknown (HELO mailpool.webpl
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4040
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-15 04:33 ---
sorry for spamming but it is bug 4193.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4040
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-15 04:31 ---
After applying my patch there are still some errors with descriptions for
non-existent rules. I opened a separate bug for these things in order to keep
the discuss
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4193
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-15 04:25 ---
Created an attachment (id=2701)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2701&action=view)
This patch removes four descriptions for non-existent ru
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4193
Summary: description exists for non-existent rule in
30_text_de.cf
Product: Spamassassin
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4040
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-15 04:09 ---
Created an attachment (id=2700)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2700&action=view)
This patch allows longer lines for non-english locales
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4040
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Yo
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3661
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-15 02:05 ---
Subject: Re: Request for HTML de-obfuscation of invisible SPAN's
> however I see Loren's point that adding a new qualifier (like the
"something" in
> "header FOO
20 matches
Mail list logo
