http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4191
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|uri_to_domain() is broken |[review] uri_to_domain() is
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4213
Summary: evil URL-encoding evasion trick
Product: Spamassassin
Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4213
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|dev@spamassassin.apache.org |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3852
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-21 17:35 ---
btw, harking back to Theo's last comment --
'Array values need to have the system array copied into the user space, then
modified. This handles both adds and
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4187
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|Future |3.1.0
--- Additional
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4068
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|SpamAssassin doesn't follow |should use consistent
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3852
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-21 18:23 ---
deletes -- $item{foo} = undef and test for exists() to see if something is set
in a given config level.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3409
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-21 18:25 ---
Created an attachment (id=2720)
-- (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2720action=view)
additional fix
fixes a strip_no_subject.t test failure
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3852
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-21 18:37 ---
Subject: Re: better way to have user configs
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 06:23:40PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
deletes -- $item{foo} = undef and test for
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3852
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-21 18:46 ---
Subject: Re: better way to have user configs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For hashes, sure (assuming undef isn't
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3852
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-21 21:18 ---
Subject: Re: better way to have user configs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
@sys = ( 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 );
as far as I know, $sys[2] =
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4176
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-21 21:44 ---
Unlike tinyurl, however the destination URL after redirection is visible in the
spammed URI, after some deofuscation. Can we make SA URI handling do the
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3409
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 06:00:36AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bug 3409: modify header ordering for DomainKeys compatibility, by placing
markup headers at the top of the message
Hrm. I don't think we want our headers at the very top, since adding Received
headers will get broken up, etc?
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4176
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-22 00:02 ---
Is the purpose of the redirection facility at nate.com and/or at zdnet.com to
allow just anyone to create a redirection? If it isn't meant for public use, as
is
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4176
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-22 00:36 ---
It's not entirely clear what the purpose of the redirectors is, but the zdnet
one
is apparently part of their business model. Yes, we have attempted to contact
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4212
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3997
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4214
Summary: DBM.pm's token_expiration function pollutes stdout
Product: Spamassassin
Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
Platform: PC
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4216
Summary: PDF Ascii Corruption by SpamAssassin
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.0.1
Platform: Sun
URL: http://www.sonicle.com
OS/Version: Solaris
Status: NEW
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4215
Summary: Russian translation for 3.0.2
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.0.2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4214
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4190
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-22 06:24 ---
Thank you.
But I think there is no need to call child_handler() explicitly after sleep().
It will be executed in any case when SIGCHLD arrives (or when SIGCHLD
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4217
Summary: Missing index in bayes_token SQL table
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.0.2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4217
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-22 06:28 ---
Created an attachment (id=2722)
-- (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2722action=view)
Patch for bayes_mysql.sql
--- You are receiving
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4217
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dev@spamassassin.apache.org
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4217
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-22 06:38 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Any idea which query exactly is slowing down?
It was this one:
select count(token) from bayes_token where id = 1274 AND atime
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Theo Van Dinter writes:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 06:00:36AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bug 3409: modify header ordering for DomainKeys compatibility, by placing
markup headers at the top of the message
Hrm. I don't think we want our
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4140
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-22 11:28 ---
Thanks Daryl. This certainly looks like exactly what I need.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are
On Tuesday 22 March 2005 19:15 CET Justin Mason wrote:
Theo Van Dinter writes:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 06:00:36AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bug 3409: modify header ordering for DomainKeys compatibility, by
placing markup headers at the top of the message
Hrm. I don't think we
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4218
Summary: PerMsgStatus $status-finish() not getting registered
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.0.2
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3852
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-22 10:49 ---
Subject: Re: better way to have user configs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Right, but the point is to have @sys be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Malte S. Stretz writes:
On Tuesday 22 March 2005 19:15 CET Justin Mason wrote:
Theo Van Dinter writes:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 06:00:36AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bug 3409: modify header ordering for DomainKeys compatibility, by
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4210
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3033
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4209
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-22 14:45 ---
I'm very certain this wouldn't work. At least in the company environments I
know where people tend to send mail with the
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4140
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Add option to use SPF |[review] Add option to use
Daniel Quinlan wrote:
Hmmm... I'm not sure this fits in with the plugin model for AWL. I
talked with Michael about it a bit and we were unable to draw any
conclusion, though. I think we might want to think about it a bit more
before we add this option, though. Options are hard to kill off.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4209
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|To Many |Too Many
--- Additional
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4140
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-22 15:40 ---
yeah, +1
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4209
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
41 matches
Mail list logo
