[Bug 3997] DNS answers get mixed up

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3997 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-11 16:04 --- Excuse my ignorance, but what are the three columns in that table under bogus errors per run ? ?? The number of times a bogus DNS response was received per

[Bug 4255] Suggestion for new rule: Anti-phishing rule.

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4255 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-11 16:40 --- Subject: Re: Suggestion for new rule: Anti-phishing rule. On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 03:48:18PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I dont agree with the WORKSFORME

[Bug 4255] Suggestion for new rule: Anti-phishing rule.

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4255 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 4255] Suggestion for new rule: Anti-phishing rule.

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4255 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-11 17:23 --- btw I remember one FP I had -- a Paypal Australia URL iirc. anyway, let's see what the nightly results say. that looks pretty good ;) --- You are

[Bug 3577] SIGHUP to spamd doesn't work if running as non-root and using a privileged port

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3577 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||4026 nThis|

[Bug 4237] spamd syslog() SIGCHLD forkbomb

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4237 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-11 18:49 --- man, this is idiotic -- it's getting to the stage where I'd rather just put in our own XS module to perform syslog without Sys::Syslog's bugs! :( incredible.

[Bug 4237] spamd syslog() SIGCHLD forkbomb

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4237 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #2750 is|0 |1 obsolete|

[Bug 3796] Spamd and quota limits.

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3796 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-11 18:55 --- it looks like DB_File doesn't deal with this quota issue properly :( We don't have control over the code that's adding the db__. prefix to the filename, and I

[Bug 4218] PerMsgStatus $status-finish() not getting registered

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4218 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|dev@spamassassin.apache.org |[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Bug 3779] MIME part data uses too much memory in place

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3779 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|Undefined |Future --- You are

[Bug 3813] RFE: Better packaging for a Windows installable version

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3813 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|Undefined |Future --- You are

[Bug 3874] Definitions of internal/trusted networks too vague

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3874 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||triage --- Additional

[Bug 3882] Failing to open auto-whitelist produces unpredictable scores

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3882 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 3888] URIBL open redirector checking misses http-equiv Refresh

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3888 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|Undefined |Future --- Additional

[Bug 3898] Request for new body part to test against

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3898 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|Undefined |Future --- You are

[Bug 3905] Whitelist/Blacklist logging enhancement

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3905 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|Undefined |Future --- Additional

[Bug 3889] Debug code is hard to use in third-party code

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3889 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 3997] DNS answers get mixed up

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3997 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-12 02:39 --- Subject: Re: DNS answers get mixed up Same test, without the DNS cache flushes before each run. fast - with Justin's patch slow - without Justin's patch

[Bug 3997] DNS answers get mixed up

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3997 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-12 02:55 --- Sidney, That patch does disable persistence the way I did it. Irrespective of any ad hoc testing, I assure you that patch does fix problems, at least in my

[Bug 3761] spamd memory use grows too high (leak?)

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3761 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-12 03:38 --- (In reply to comment #2) Glen, again, can you verify for us what version of SpamAssassin you were using? And, due to the age of this entry, can you verify

[Bug 3761] spamd memory use grows too high (leak?)

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3761 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unspecified |3.0.2 --- You are

[Bug 3997] DNS answers get mixed up

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3997 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-12 04:02 --- Just a quick coment that Jonathan's test method sounds reasonable to me. He also identifies a very specific sequence of events that apparently leads to the bug:

[Bug 3997] DNS answers get mixed up

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3997 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-12 05:49 --- Jonathan, I still don't understand how the source code and your explanation and your tcpdump results fit together, or why the problem goes away in your

[Bug 3889] Debug code is hard to use in third-party code

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3889 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-12 07:48 --- Subject: Re: Debug code is hard to use in third-party code On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 11:04:44PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It should be fine for M:S:Message

[Bug 4256] New: sa-learn fails to learn

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4256 Summary: sa-learn fails to learn Product: Spamassassin Version: 3.0.2 Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

ArchiveIterator fault handling

I'm cleaning up the fault-handling in mass-check a bit for some of my own scripting. My main question: should ArchiveIterator return a fatal error (that would propagate up) if a target is not accessible? All of those reading/scanning functions just return; regardless of errors. Daniel --

Re: ArchiveIterator fault handling

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Daniel Quinlan writes: I'm cleaning up the fault-handling in mass-check a bit for some of my own scripting. My main question: should ArchiveIterator return a fatal error (that would propagate up) if a target is not accessible? All of those

[Bug 4068] should use consistent CRLF/LF line endings

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4068 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|3.1.0 |3.1.1 --- Additional

[Bug 3934] allow safe use of spamd on a multiuser machine using UNIX domain sockets and setgid spamc

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3934 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-12 14:45 --- Justin? I'd apply this except for your concern. 3.1.0 is the right place if we are going to make this change. --- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug 2892] Disregard attempts at Bayes poison

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2892 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|3.1.0 |3.2.0 --- Additional

[Bug 3957] Italian translation for unsafe_report

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3957 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dev@spamassassin.apache.org

[Bug 3957] Italian translation for unsafe_report

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3957 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 3997] DNS answers get mixed up

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3997 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-12 15:42 --- I think I now understand the problem and a simnple solution. The problem is that there is nothing in the RFCs to prevent reuse of a UDP source port once there is

[Bug 3500] RFE: allow specification of nameserver for RBL queries

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3500 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-12 15:55 --- Created an attachment (id=2784) -- (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2784action=view) Use specific DNS servers for certain RBLs In 2.6x, I had