http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4499
Summary: whitelist_from does not work for me
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.0.3
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P3
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4161
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-24 02:19 ---
Bug 3871 is not the same one.
The group reported by #3871 is used for spamd itself after port binding.
On the other hand, the group I reported is used for
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4500
Summary: new way to skip URIBL tests
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.1.0
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4500
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-24 03:13 ---
Created an attachment (id=3035)
-- (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=3035action=view)
sample mail
--- You are receiving this mail
Daniel,
If you get a chance to ask Andrew about his thoughts about Support Vector
Machines (SVM) I would be interested in hearing his answer. I would like to
compare the results of logistic regression with SVM. Perhaps we can try both
on the same data used for the 3.1 perceptron scoring and
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4396
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-24 03:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=3036)
-- (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=3036action=view)
fix the conf location
see the patch. the conf is at
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4500
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-24 03:41 ---
Btw, Pyzor is skipped too:
[15867] warn: pyzor: check failed: internal error
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4500
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-24 03:49 ---
Created an attachment (id=3037)
-- (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=3037action=view)
Patch for fix pyzor
--- You are receiving this
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4500
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-24 04:17 ---
Hi. The URI isn't even parsed.
[20196] dbg: uri: running uri tests; score so far=0.1961
[20196] dbg: uri: running uri tests; score so far=2.7651
[20196] dbg:
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4500
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-24 04:54 ---
It looks like spamassassin decodes the body everytime, even
if it is not encoded at all. The decoded output is garbage,
of course and does not contain any URIs
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4500
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-24 05:43 ---
Created an attachment (id=3038)
-- (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=3038action=view)
First workaround
This is a workaround to deal with the
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #3037|Patch for fix pyzor |Patch to fix pyzor
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4500
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-24 10:45 ---
Thanks for the ticket, however I have some comments.
1) the Pyzor patch is best sent to the Pyzor folks, since there's nothing we can
do about their code.
2)
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4499
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4500
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-24 10:52 ---
Subject: Re: new way to skip URIBL tests
On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 10:45:31AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MUAs that do things the right way:
mutt
Outlook
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4500
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-24 10:54 ---
The webmail I've tried (and where it works) is uebimiau
(http://www.uebimiau.org).
I've just tested pine and it does display binary gibberish.
--- You
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Loren --
it's not a matter of popularity -- it's a matter of being horrendously
difficult to support.
Without somebody doing the work to profile this beforehand to see if it
helps (in particular loading code from disk may be *slower* than what we
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4500
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-24 12:28 ---
Agreed,
ok, so I'm going to make a pyzor PR, because this one
is a problem. I've seen many more messages with some
strange encoding etc which makes pyzor
Loren Wilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there a way that [user rules] could be saved in a more-compiled
state when used with spamd and similar? Maybe name the rules with the
username as part of the procedure name, and just add them to the
namespace the first time encountered?
Beyond the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Quinlan writes:
Loren Wilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there a way that [user rules] could be saved in a more-compiled
state when used with spamd and similar? Maybe name the rules with the
username as part of the procedure name,
Was nice meeting with some of the SA devs and other folks after
CEAS.
One thing that's stuck in my mind is that I remember seeing a
laptop on the built in table by the wall at the Rose and Crown
(pub) when I got there at about 5:15, but I don't recall seeing
someone grab it when we left for
Justin Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't get it -- how does that help?
Basically, user rule would always run last. Something like:
for (@priorities) {
standard prorities loop
}
if ($allow_user_rules $defined_rules{$user}) {
do_xxx_tests($user, ...); # $user is the priority
On Sunday, July 24, 2005, 3:42:07 PM, Jeff Chan wrote:
One thing that's stuck in my mind is that I remember seeing a
laptop on the built in table by the wall at the Rose and Crown
(pub) when I got there at about 5:15, but I don't recall seeing
someone grab it when we left for dinner. Did that
I'm not sure what I'll *need* to make good scores. Last time around, the
results were pants (--reuse was broken), so I don't have much to go on as
far as numbers are concerned.
Cheers,
Henry
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Justin Mason wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Theo Van
+1
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005, Daniel Quinlan wrote:
I propose we create a Rules Project as a part of Apache SpamAssassin.
Initially, the project will consist of the existing (empty) rules
directory in Subversion (the CVS replacement used by the ASF).
Each committer will have their own sandbox to
it's not a matter of popularity -- it's a matter of being horrendously
difficult to support.
I grant from what I've seen of PMS that this gets pretty ugly. Or at least
it seems to to me, but then a lot of apparently good Perl looks pretty ugly
to me. ;-) But I'm a C++ and Algol programmer,
Hello Duncan, All,
Saturday, July 23, 2005, 8:36:58 PM, you wrote:
DF * We discussed at length the ideas for the new rules project, and we
DF came up with some ideas, which we're trying to track
DF http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RulesProjectPlan (Please give us
DF your feedback)
Question
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Loren Wilton writes:
There are a lot of things I'd like to see done with rules to make rule
writing both easier and more productive, and I;ve been trying to come up
with a structure that conveniently supports all the things I'd like to see.
A few
Saturday, July 23, 2005, 8:36:58 PM, Duncan wrote:
DF * We discussed at length the ideas for the new rules project, and we
DF came up with some ideas, which we're trying to track
DF http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RulesProjectPlan (Please give us
DF your feedback)
Saturday, July 23, 2005, 8:36:58 PM, Duncan wrote:
DF * We discussed at length the ideas for the new rules project, and we
DF came up with some ideas, which we're trying to track
DF http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RulesProjectPlan (Please give us
DF your feedback)
Added to
31 matches
Mail list logo
