Getting un-blacklisted

2005-08-27 Thread Marc Perkel
I had someone contact me about spam filtering and their domain is blacklisted as follows: * 4.0 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL listed in the SBL blocklist * [URIs: icanimmigrate.com] They claim the bought the domain in the last year and weren't aware they were blacklisted. Wh

Re: Release 3.1.0-rc2

2005-08-27 Thread OpenMacNews
hi all, quick question, if i may ... i haven't been following all the release details here. what's the equivalent revision for this release, 310rc2 ? specifically, i'm trying to 'realign' and figure out the *functional* delta between it, and what i'm currently monkeying with, SpamAssassin (2

[Bug 4558] oscommerce ships with an open redirector

2005-08-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4558 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-27 22:51 --- (In reply to comment #12) > FWIW, when I click on the links here, I don't get redirected, I get told that > I > need a cookie first. That's odd, This one works

[vote] Release 3.1.0-rc2

2005-08-27 Thread Duncan Findlay
I hereby propose that we release Apache SpamAssassin 3.1.0-rc2 http://people.apache.org/~duncf/devel/ md5sum of archive files: 1e2ecf555d62deae136b08fb482e8f68 Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.0-rc2.tar.bz2 41fe5c0c5ab226e0d33de20c10f69240 Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.0-rc2.tar.gz 91bc48f87eb520040ece42dced88624

[Bug 4494] [review] sa-learn uses local_tests_only=0 which can mess up bayes

2005-08-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4494 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 4552] [review] Unitialized value warnings in spamd

2005-08-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4552 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 4494] [review] sa-learn uses local_tests_only=0 which can mess up bayes

2005-08-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4494 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard|1 more vote |ready to apply --- Additio

[Bug 4552] [review] Unitialized value warnings in spamd

2005-08-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4552 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard|one vote needed |ready to apply --- You a

[Bug 4552] [review] Unitialized value warnings in spamd

2005-08-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4552 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-27 20:14 --- +1 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

[Bug 4552] [review] Unitialized value warnings in spamd

2005-08-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4552 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard|two votes needed|one vote needed --- Additi

RC2?

2005-08-27 Thread Duncan Findlay
Remaining bugs in 3.1.0 queue: 4494nor ASSI[review] sa-learn uses local_tests_only=0 which can mess ... Patch ready, needs one more vote. 4552maj NEW [review] Unitialized value warnings in spamd Patch ready, needs two more votes. 4558nor NEW oscommerce ship

[Bug 4552] [review] Unitialized value warnings in spamd

2005-08-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4552 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Unitialized value warnings |[review] Unitialized value

[Bug 4552] Unitialized value warnings in spamd

2005-08-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4552 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-27 18:20 --- Created an attachment (id=3105) --> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=3105&action=view) Patch to fix this This fixed the uninitialized value wa

[Bug 4412] [review] DnsResolver.pm/connect_sock() fails on IPv6 resolver address

2005-08-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4412 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 4558] oscommerce ships with an open redirector

2005-08-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4558 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-27 17:56 --- FWIW, when I click on the links here, I don't get redirected, I get told that I need a cookie first. --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You ar

[Bug 4494] [review] sa-learn uses local_tests_only=0 which can mess up bayes

2005-08-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4494 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||1 more vote --- Additional

[Bug 4491] 25_replace.cf in 3.1.0 is very poor quality

2005-08-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4491 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|3.1.0 |3.1.1 --- Additional Comme

[Bug 4370] [review] Failed exec in forked helper process continues its miserable life

2005-08-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4370 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Addi

[Bug 4476] prefork: sysread(8) failed after 300 secs (no children responding)

2005-08-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4476 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 4412] [review] DnsResolver.pm/connect_sock() fails on IPv6 resolver address

2005-08-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4412 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard|needs 1 vote|ready to commit --- You

[Bug 4412] [review] DnsResolver.pm/connect_sock() fails on IPv6 resolver address

2005-08-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4412 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-27 17:41 --- +1 jm's on vacation, so I'll apply this shortly --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assi

[Bug 4558] oscommerce ships with an open redirector

2005-08-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4558 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-27 16:31 --- >> Why "60"? Is that an arbitrary number or was it chosen for some reason? > Arbitrary, based on typical length of real domain names, and the usual > concerns on

[Bug 4558] oscommerce ships with an open redirector

2005-08-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4558 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-27 16:18 --- I believe that ; behaves the same way as & in a CGI parameter string in some cases (though I don't know about PHP). Perhaps this would be better? redirector_patte

[Bug 4558] oscommerce ships with an open redirector

2005-08-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4558 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-27 16:13 --- Subject: Re: oscommerce ships with an open redirector > In response to Comment #6: > {5,60} > This fails in a valid (though rare) case like "x.us". quinlan in I

[Bug 4558] oscommerce ships with an open redirector

2005-08-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4558 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-27 15:03 --- A simpler, easier-to-read regex would be redirector_pattern m'/redirect\.php\?.*(?<=[\?&])goto=(.*?)(?:$|&)' --- You are receiving this mail because: -

[Bug 4558] oscommerce ships with an open redirector

2005-08-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4558 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-27 14:52 --- In response to Comment #6: {5,60} This fails in a valid (though rare) case like "x.us". quinlan in IRC suggested that {4,255} would be correct. Wouldn't this fai

[Bug 4558] oscommerce ships with an open redirector

2005-08-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4558 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-27 13:49 --- Subject: Re: oscommerce ships with an open redirector redirector_pattern m'^http://[^/]{5,60}/redirect\.php\?[\w\-\.\&\=]{0,100}?\&goto=([\w\-\.]{4,6 0})'i woul

[Bug 4558] oscommerce ships with an open redirector

2005-08-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4558 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Addi

[Bug 4561] Another open redirector

2005-08-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4561 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 4561] New: Another open redirector

2005-08-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4561 Summary: Another open redirector Product: Spamassassin Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version) Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal P

[Bug 4558] oscommerce ships with an open redirector

2005-08-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4558 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-27 03:20 --- Nice one! Along the same lines that fails on this uri ;) http://demo.oscommerce.com/redirect.php?action=url&blahgoto=www.p.com&goto=www.o.com&goto=

[Bug 4558] oscommerce ships with an open redirector

2005-08-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4558 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-27 02:31 --- Of course that last one was missing the trailing slash and shouldn't be case sensitive, so: redirector_pattern /redirect\.php.*?(?:\?|&)goto=(.*?)(?:$|&)/i ---

[Bug 4558] oscommerce ships with an open redirector

2005-08-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4558 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|Undefined |3.1.0 --- You are receiv

[Bug 4558] oscommerce ships with an open redirector

2005-08-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4558 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-27 02:25 --- You actually need to check to make sure it's really 'goto' and not 'blahgoto'. Otherwise it'll match the first 'blahgoto' and miss any 'goto' that follows it. Ex