[Bug 4788] [review] Backport sa-update from 3.2

2006-03-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4788 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-03-12 04:35 --- (In reply to comment #40) > I /think/ I can speak for SARE that a) yes, we'll definitely want to make a > channel, but b) we most definitely don't want to cau

[Bug 4788] [review] Backport sa-update from 3.2

2006-03-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4788 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-03-12 04:29 --- > I'm not too worried about SARE BTW. They seem to be pretty happy with the RDJ stuff, so I don't think there's a strong desire to make a channel. I /think/

ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.1.1 available!

2006-03-11 Thread Theo Van Dinter
Apache SpamAssassin 3.1.1 is now available! This is a maintainance release of the 3.1.x branch. Downloads are available from: http://spamassassin.apache.org/downloads.cgi?update=200603111700 The release file will also be available via CPAN in the near future. md5sum of archive files: 33bc2b

Re: [VOTE #2] SpamAssassin 3.1.1 release

2006-03-11 Thread Michael Parker
+1 Michael

[Bug 4507] [review] Add support for URIBL.com

2006-03-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4507 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-03-11 23:10 --- (In reply to comment #8) > i am speaking on behalf of uribl.com when i say you have our blessing to move > URIBL rules out of 70_testing.cf and into 25_uribl

Re: rsync area non-functional, now fixed

2006-03-11 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 12:33:01AM +, Justin Mason wrote: > > I'm really not sure why helios doesn't get svn 1.3 installed, but ... maybe > > we'll just have to build our own newer version. > > well -- request it -- Mads would probably install it if asked. That's one way of looking at it. H

Re: [VOTE #2] SpamAssassin 3.1.1 release

2006-03-11 Thread Sidney Markowitz
Klaus Heinz wrote: > Is this correct? > > rules/v310.pre If your question is whether there should be a v311.pre, the answer is no, the file is for local site customization that might not apply when a new version is released. There are no incompatible changes in 3.1.1. I expect that version 3.2

Re: [VOTE #2] SpamAssassin 3.1.1 release

2006-03-11 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 10:49:46PM +0100, Klaus Heinz wrote: > Is this correct? > rules/v310.pre I'm not what your question is. That file does and should exist in the tarball, yes. -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "Down the Tubes": WHAT tubes? And do we need more than 1? pgpCxtTD6d10E.pgp Des

Re: [VOTE #2] SpamAssassin 3.1.1 release

2006-03-11 Thread Klaus Heinz
Theo Van Dinter wrote: > BTW: per ASF policies, only PMC member votes are binding for a release, > but we encourage everyone to download, test, and report any issues! Is this correct? rules/v310.pre ciao Klaus

[Bug 4825] New: Mail::SpamAssassin::Client::ping always returns 0

2006-03-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4825 Summary: Mail::SpamAssassin::Client::ping always returns 0 Product: Spamassassin Version: 3.1.0 Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal