Theo Van Dinter wrote:
Please test out these files and vote as to whether or not to release them as
3.1.2. Thanks. :)
rules/v312.pre still contains:
# This file was installed during the installation of SpamAssassin
# 3.2.0
Apart from the warn: config: can not determine userstate dir
Theo Van Dinter writes:
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 11:35:18PM -0500, Michael Parker wrote:
I fear that the warning is going to lead to a HUGE support headache. We
either need to override the userstate dir for all the tests, add an
additional possible userstate dir that will for sure exist or
Hi there,
I have readied a new set of 3.1.2 files. They are available at:
http://people.apache.org/~felicity/312/
Please test out these files and vote as to whether or not to release them as
3.1.2. Thanks. :)
BTW: per ASF policies, only PMC member votes are binding for a release,
but we
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 06:08:15PM +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
fwiw, a long term fix would be option (b) -- tests should not be
using the user's real userstate dir.
Yeah, but that's not actually the issue.
The warn() (now info()) is in the M::SA::get_and_create_userstate_dir()
function which
Theo Van Dinter writes:
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 06:08:15PM +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
fwiw, a long term fix would be option (b) -- tests should not be
using the user's real userstate dir.
Yeah, but that's not actually the issue.
The warn() (now info()) is in the
Theo Van Dinter [EMAIL PROTECTED] [25-05-2006 19:10]:
I have readied a new set of 3.1.2 files. They are available at:
[...]
$ LANG=pl_PL prove -b t/gtube.t t/rule_names.t
t/gtube.Not found: gtube = BODY: Generic Test for
Unsolicited Bulk Email
# Failed test 2 in
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4908
Summary: fix t/gtube.t to function in all languages, etc
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.1.1
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 07:44:22PM +0200, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote:
$ LANG=pl_PL prove -b t/gtube.t t/rule_names.t
t/gtube.Not found: gtube = BODY: Generic Test for
Unsolicited Bulk Email
# Failed test 2 in t/SATest.pm at line 592
[...]
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4908
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|Undefined |3.2.0
--- Additional
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
Hi there,
I have readied a new set of 3.1.2 files. They are available at:
http://people.apache.org/~felicity/312/
Please test out these files and vote as to whether or not to release them as
3.1.2. Thanks. :)
BTW: per ASF policies, only PMC member votes are
+1 from me
--j.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4909
Summary: Some PL_* rules match their names, so t/rule_names.t
fails
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.1.1
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4906
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-26 00:55 ---
I'm not completely clear about how often, or under what exact circumstances and
config, you're seeing this but you're probably seeing bug 4179.
The last
13 matches
Mail list logo
