Marc Perkel wrote:
>
>
> Matt Kettler wrote:
>>
>> Well, really this isn't a matter for spamassassin-devel. URIBL has it's
>> own mailing lists.
>>
>> That said, uribl.com is back up, and got professional DDOS mitigation
>> assistance from Prolexic.
>>
>>
>
> OK - it might be a little off topic
Marc Perkel wrote:
OK - it might be a little off topic but who is Prolexic?
They probably have a website. They're one of those fancy Internet
companies.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5257
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5497
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Matt Kettler wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
OK - we need a plan. uribl.org is still down. We need a plan to make
various anti-spam services immune from these kinds of attacks.
So - who has some ideas?
Well, really this isn't a matter for spamassassin-devel. URIBL has it's
own mailing li
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4964
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5497
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-09 04:01 ---
Thanks. After monitoring the logs (with my spamd patch) for a day, I had changed
the threshold to 0.11 on our system and it looks like it is learning OK.
149
