Check out the SA:Conf man file.
Thanks. This answered my question
if (version > 3.00)
header MY_FOO ...
endif
regards,
KAM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> I'm trying to please too many masters ;-) Is there a way in a rule cf
> file to encapsulate a rule with a IF SA VERSION IS 3.2.0 or Greater,
> include this rule, else...?
>
> Regards,
> KAM
BAH HA HA HAR!
I had asked the
I'm trying to please too many masters ;-) Is there a way in a rule cf file to
encapsulate a rule with a IF SA VERSION IS 3.2.0 or Greater, include this
rule, else...?
Regards,
KAM
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5557
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-19 10:36 ---
reminder from bug 5444: if the calling code calls $permsgstatus->finish(), then
we may have a bug to fix in SA.
otherwise, the calling code needs to be fixed
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5557
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5449
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-19 09:32 ---
btw, if anyone wants to put out a 3.2.2, this can be deferred for 3.2.3 no
problem...
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assi
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5563
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO||5564
nThis|
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5564
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-19 09:16 ---
Created an attachment (id=4053)
--> (http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=4053&action=view)
backport for 3.2.x
here's those 2 changes as
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5557
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5564
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn||5563
Severity|norm
10 matches
Mail list logo