http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5599
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-21 15:45 ---
Oops, what was I thinking?
- for (my $i = $#{$deck}; $i >= 0; $i--) {
+ for (my $i = $#{$deck}; $i > 0; $i--) {
svn -m 'actually, the last iteration in fi
I have an underutilized machine with a dual core athlon 5600 - 8 gigs of
ram - and severa hundred gigs of free space. I could create a virtual
server for you. Will that work?
Justin Mason wrote:
Unfortunately the only offer has been a non-committer -- and I'd
prefer to keep it committer-only d
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 08:08:39PM +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
> Unfortunately the only offer has been a non-committer -- and I'd
> prefer to keep it committer-only due to confidentiality. Anyone?
Yeah, I still have the machine I offered a while ago available. :)
I can add a new run after my perso
Unfortunately the only offer has been a non-committer -- and I'd
prefer to keep it committer-only due to confidentiality. Anyone?
--j.
Justin Mason writes:
> Committers --
>
> Do any of you have spare machines that fit these criteria?
>
> - are linux/x86 (preferably)
>
> - have a perl th
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5283
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-21 06:58 ---
svn -m
'remove a bug 5283 workaround which is now redundant (see bug 5645)' ci
Sending lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Message.pm
Committed revision 578110.
-
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5632
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-21 00:59 ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Oh yeah, I'm in no rush for a 3.2.4 release for this either. Heck, we took a
> month to make another release to fix the bug that
