Re: Bugzilla no longer opens text attachments in your browser

On 17/01/2010 1:00 AM, Sidney Markowitz wrote: > Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote, On 17/01/10 4:21 PM: >> Does anyone else find it annoying that Bugzilla no longer opens text >> attachments (like patches) in your browser, and instead triggers a file >> download. I think this happened when BZ was upgraded

Re: Bugzilla no longer opens text attachments in your browser

Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote, On 17/01/10 4:21 PM: > Does anyone else find it annoying that Bugzilla no longer opens text > attachments (like patches) in your browser, and instead triggers a file > download. I think this happened when BZ was upgraded to version 3. That was probably related to one of

Bugzilla no longer opens text attachments in your browser

Does anyone else find it annoying that Bugzilla no longer opens text attachments (like patches) in your browser, and instead triggers a file download. I think this happened when BZ was upgraded to version 3. Daryl

[Bug 5590] Scantime is very long unless "use bytes" hack is used

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5590 John Hardin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jhar...@impsec.org --- Comment #2

[Bug 6287] [review] DKIM validation fails with "PUBLIC KEY: UNSUPPORTED KEY TYPE"

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6287 Mark Martinec changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P5 |P2 Target Milestone|Undefined

[Bug 6287] DKIM validation fails with "PUBLIC KEY: UNSUPPORTED KEY TYPE"

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6287 --- Comment #2 from Mark Martinec 2010-01-16 16:48:39 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=4647) --> (https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=4647) patch to a dbg() call to improve diagnosability A proposed patch to incl

[Bug 5590] Scantime is very long unless "use bytes" hack is used

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5590 --- Comment #21 from Justin Mason 2010-01-16 15:58:59 UTC --- btw, I think this significant slowdown in 3.3.0 may be as a result of increased use of replace_rules rules, compared to when bug 4596 happened. -- Configure bugmail: https

[Bug 5924] [review] cross-sign GPG keys, have an official SA keyring

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5924 Justin Mason changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #4628|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug 6288] remove 265FA05B from the list of trusted-by-default sa-update keys

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6288 Justin Mason changed: What|Removed |Added CC||j...@jmason.org Target Milesto

[Bug 6288] New: remove 265FA05B from the list of trusted-by-default sa-update keys

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6288 Summary: remove 265FA05B from the list of trusted-by-default sa-update keys Product: Spamassassin Version: 3.3.0 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NE

[Bug 6287] DKIM validation fails with "PUBLIC KEY: UNSUPPORTED KEY TYPE"

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6287 --- Comment #1 from Mark Martinec 2010-01-16 12:18:49 UTC --- > Although DKIM validation works OK for some sites, for some it fails with > "unsupported key type". > > [1353] dbg: dkim: signature verification result: INVALID (PUBLIC KEY

[Bug 6287] New: DKIM validation fails with "PUBLIC KEY: UNSUPPORTED KEY TYPE"

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6287 Summary: DKIM validation fails with "PUBLIC KEY: UNSUPPORTED KEY TYPE" Product: Spamassassin Version: 3.2.5 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW

[Bug 5590] Scantime is very long unless "use bytes" hack is used

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5590 --- Comment #20 from Henrik Krohns 2010-01-16 06:44:50 UTC --- Surprisinly total scan time was only 10min vs 13min in favor of use bytes. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You

[Bug 5590] Scantime is very long unless "use bytes" hack is used

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5590 --- Comment #19 from Henrik Krohns 2010-01-16 06:38:51 UTC --- Here's a quick run of 10k ham + 10k spam on perl 5.10.0. $ ./freqdiff -c ham.log.nobytes ham.log.bytes 518 __HIGHBITS 64 T_HK_MUCHMONEY 52 __hk_million 39

[Bug 6271] FH_DATE_PAST_20XX rule should be dropped, or fixed to use eval function instead of fixed date

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6271 Rob Janssen changed: What|Removed |Added CC|pe1...@amsat.org| -- Configure bugmail: https://