Re: proposed 3.3.1 tarballs, take 2

2010-03-18 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 3/16/2010 2:22 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 19:14 +0100, Mark Martinec wrote: 65 testing rules without score All starting with T_ presumably. So all is well, these rules receive a default score of 0.01 or -0.01, so there is no need for concern I suppose.

[Bug 5031] Can't check Archive::Tar package version containing underscore

2010-03-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5031 Daniel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||le...@jam-software.com --- Comment #3

Re: proposed 3.3.1 tarballs, take 2

2010-03-18 Thread Yet Another Ninja
On 2010-03-18 12:19, Justin Mason wrote: On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:14, Justin Mason wrote: On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:12, Yet Another Ninja wrote: On 2010-03-18 12:04, Justin Mason wrote: On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:00, Doc Schneider wrote: Mark Martinec wrote: http://people.apache.org/~j

Re: proposed 3.3.1 tarballs, take 2

2010-03-18 Thread Justin Mason
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:14, Justin Mason wrote: > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:12, Yet Another Ninja wrote: >> On 2010-03-18 12:04, Justin Mason wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:00, Doc Schneider wrote: Mark Martinec wrote: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~jm/devel/PRO

Re: proposed 3.3.1 tarballs, take 2

2010-03-18 Thread Justin Mason
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:12, Yet Another Ninja wrote: > On 2010-03-18 12:04, Justin Mason wrote: >> >> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:00, Doc Schneider wrote: >>> >>> Mark Martinec wrote: > > http://people.apache.org/~jm/devel/PROPOSED-3.3.1.txt > http://people.apache.org/~jm/devel/ >>>

Re: proposed 3.3.1 tarballs, take 2

2010-03-18 Thread Yet Another Ninja
On 2010-03-18 12:04, Justin Mason wrote: On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:00, Doc Schneider wrote: Mark Martinec wrote: http://people.apache.org/~jm/devel/PROPOSED-3.3.1.txt http://people.apache.org/~jm/devel/ this is now using the updates.spamassassin.org rules tarball, repackaged; the code tarball

Re: proposed 3.3.1 tarballs, take 2

2010-03-18 Thread Justin Mason
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:00, Doc Schneider wrote: > Mark Martinec wrote: >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~jm/devel/PROPOSED-3.3.1.txt >>> http://people.apache.org/~jm/devel/ >>> this is now using the updates.spamassassin.org rules tarball, >>> repackaged; the code tarball is effectively unchang

Re: proposed 3.3.1 tarballs, take 2

2010-03-18 Thread Doc Schneider
Mark Martinec wrote: http://people.apache.org/~jm/devel/PROPOSED-3.3.1.txt http://people.apache.org/~jm/devel/ this is now using the updates.spamassassin.org rules tarball, repackaged; the code tarball is effectively unchanged, but rebuilt anyway just out of paranoia. One day left of the voting

Re: proposed 3.3.1 tarballs, take 2

2010-03-18 Thread Mark Martinec
> http://people.apache.org/~jm/devel/PROPOSED-3.3.1.txt > http://people.apache.org/~jm/devel/ > this is now using the updates.spamassassin.org rules tarball, > repackaged; the code tarball is effectively unchanged, but rebuilt > anyway just out of paranoia. One day left of the voting period, so fa