Re: What happened to http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/ ?

On Mar 19, 2010, at 7:04 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > On Sat, 2010-03-20 at 02:39 +0100, Mark Martinec wrote: >> What happened to http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/ ? >> It bring up a list of ASF projects under its 'Product:' menu, > > Talking about the Search form. > >> but SpamAssassi

Re: What happened to http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/ ?

When I follow the link to a SpamAssassin bug from my sa-bugs archive, I get either a no such bug error page or I get a bug from the Tomcat project. Example of the latter https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=3993

Re: What happened to http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/ ?

On Sat, 2010-03-20 at 02:39 +0100, Mark Martinec wrote: > What happened to http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/ ? > It bring up a list of ASF projects under its 'Product:' menu, Talking about the Search form. > but SpamAssassin is not on that list!? I guess this should better bet directed at i

Re: What happened to http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/ ?

On 3/19/2010 9:39 PM, Mark Martinec wrote: > What happened to http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/ ? > It bring up a list of ASF projects under its 'Product:' menu, > but SpamAssassin is not on that list!? > > Mark > > I get "Welcome to SA Bugzilla" now..

What happened to http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/ ?

What happened to http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/ ? It bring up a list of ASF projects under its 'Product:' menu, but SpamAssassin is not on that list!? Mark

Re: Regional Rules (was: [Bug 6378] [RFE] RIR based Regional Rules)

On Fri, 19 Mar 2010, Karsten Br?ckelmann wrote: This just reminded of one of the two rules that are now in the 3.3.1 tarball, with no explicit score -- and thus a score of 1.0. Despite John's clear intent, to test with a *low* score. Anyway, the currently live rule in question, in John's own wor

Regional Rules (was: [Bug 6378] [RFE] RIR based Regional Rules)

> https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6378 > Adam Katz changed: >[...] __RCVD_VIA_APNIC_LE and __RCVD_VIA_LACNIC_LE, both > present as meta tests because it is dangerous to publish them as rules that > can > be assigned higher scores. > > See http://ruleq

[Bug 6382] [review] add missing unwhitelist_from_dkim, remove facebook and linkedin from dkim whitelisting

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6382 Kevin A. McGrail changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kmcgr...@pccc.com --- Commen

[Bug 6378] [RFE] RIR based Regional Rules

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6378 Adam Katz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||antis...@khopis.com --- Comment #9

[Bug 6371] Domains from 90_sare_freemail.cf not in 20_freemail_domains.cf

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6371 AXB changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alex.ur...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from

[Bug 6371] Domains from 90_sare_freemail.cf not in 20_freemail_domains.cf

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6371 Mark Martinec changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P5 |P3 Target Milestone|Undefined

[Bug 6375] win32: posix macro not implemented - spamd

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6375 Mark Martinec changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P5 |P2 Target Milestone|Undefined

[Bug 6376] win32: consider negative pids under windows in spamds waitpid

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6376 Mark Martinec changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P5 |P3 Target Milestone|Undefined

[Bug 6377] win32: spamd signal handling

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6377 Mark Martinec changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P5 |P3 Target Milestone|Undefined

[Bug 6382] [review] add missing unwhitelist_from_dkim, remove facebook and linkedin from dkim whitelisting

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6382 Mark Martinec changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|feature request: add in |[review] add missing

[Bug 6382] feature request: add in missing unwhitelist_from_dkim

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6382 --- Comment #3 from Mark Martinec 2010-03-19 17:54:10 UTC --- Bug 6382: removed facebook and linkedin from def_whitelist_from_dkim Sending rules/60_whitelist_dkim.cf Committed revision 925354. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apa

[Bug 6382] feature request: add in missing unwhitelist_from_dkim

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6382 Mark Martinec changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P5 |P3 Target Milestone|Undefined

ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.3.1 available

Release Notes -- Apache SpamAssassin -- Version 3.3.1 Introduction This is a minor release, adding a new URIBL network rule (URIBL_DBL_SPAM, for the Spamhaus DBL). Downloading and availability Downloads are available from: http://spamassassin.apache

[Bug 6382] feature request: add in missing unwhitelist_from_dkim

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6382 John Wilcock changed: What|Removed |Added CC||j...@tradoc.fr -- Configure bug

[Bug 6382] feature request: add in missing unwhitelist_from_dkim

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6382 Michael Scheidell changed: What|Removed |Added CC||scheid...@secnap.net --- Co

[Bug 6382] New: feature request: add in missing unwhitelist_from_dkim

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6382 Summary: feature request: add in missing unwhitelist_from_dkim Product: Spamassassin Version: 3.3.0 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal