[Bug 6362] [review] Change (urirhssub) mask syntax to netmask

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6362 --- Comment #35 from Mark Martinec 2010-04-05 23:55:22 UTC --- trunk: Bug 6362: let t/dnsbl_subtests.t choose a random free port instead of using a fixed preconfigured port number for the spawned test DNS server Sending t/dnsbl_su

Hudson build is back to stable : SpamAssassin-trunk #5251

See

Re: The recent Hudson failure

On Mon, 5 Apr 2010, Adam Katz wrote: The unstable result comes from a failed meta test due to a dependency error caused by John Hardin's removal of ADVANCE_FEE_2_NEW Not removal, rather marking something dependant on it as "publish" without also marking it as "publish" - or doing a test build

Re: The recent Hudson failure

On 04/05/2010 01:56 PM, Sidney Markowitz wrote: > Am I right in thinking that this has to be a problem with the > build/test server and not the result of any of the SpamAssassin > checkins? Does anyone know how to fix this? That's my thinking, though it looks like it might be resolved as of build

Hudson build is unstable: SpamAssassin-trunk #5250

See

The recent Hudson failure

Apache Hudson Server wrote, On 6/04/10 3:51 AM: > [locks-and-latches] All the locks released > FATAL: Timer already cancelled. > java.lang.IllegalStateException: Timer already cancelled. > at java.util.Timer.sched(Timer.java:354) > at java.util.Timer.schedule(Timer.java:170) > at

Re: Mass Changing of Bugs

On 24/03/2010 11:42, Justin Mason wrote: > On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:34, Mark Thomas wrote: >> On 24/03/2010 11:24, Justin Mason wrote: >>> So it sounds like, when the "Change Several Bugs At Once" option is >>> used, if _any_ of the bugs qualify for the above condition, _all_ >>> of the bugs are

Build failed in Hudson: SpamAssassin-trunk #5249

See Changes: [spamassassin_role] promotions validated [jm] auto-generated test rules [khopesh] auto-generated SpamCop neighbor rules [sidney] Test rule for my sandbox [jm] auto-generated test rules [spamassassin_role

[Bug 6304] [review] spamd is spawning and killing processes too often

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6304 --- Comment #17 from Kevin A. McGrail 2010-04-05 14:36:34 UTC --- (In reply to comment #16) > (In reply to comment #12) > > SendingMakefile.PL > > Sendinglib/Mail/SpamAssassin/SpamdForkScaling.pm > > Sendingspamd

[Bug 6304] [review] spamd is spawning and killing processes too often

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6304 --- Comment #16 from Micah 2010-04-05 14:34:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) > SendingMakefile.PL > Sendinglib/Mail/SpamAssassin/SpamdForkScaling.pm > Sendingspamd/spamd.raw > Transmitting file data ... > Comm

[Bug 6304] [review] spamd is spawning and killing processes too often

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6304 Micah changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mi...@riseup.net --- Comment #15 from M

Fwd: Re: [Mimedefang] Possible Incompatibility with SpamAssassin 3.3.1

Possible bug with Bayes? Original Message Subject:Re: [Mimedefang] Possible Incompatibility with SpamAssassin 3.3.1 Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 09:33:07 -0400 From: Dave O'Neill Reply-To: mimedef...@lists.roaringpenguin.com To: mimedef...@lists.roaringpenguin.c