Re: Two bugs left just needing 1 vote for 3.3.2 Re: Proposal: 3.3.2-rc1

On 05/12, Michael Parker wrote: > > # Used during the prerelease/release-candidate part of the official release > > # process. If you hacked up your SA, you should add a version_tag to your > > .cf > > # files; this variable should not be modified. > > @EXTRA_VERSION = qw(); > > > > I'm supposed

Re: Two bugs left just needing 1 vote for 3.3.2 Re: Proposal: 3.3.2-rc1

On May 12, 2011, at 8:42 PM, Warren Togami Jr. wrote: > On 05/12/2011 12:24 PM, Mark Martinec wrote: >> Warren wrote: 6526 is not critical, it could be fixed after rc1 or anytime later in sa-update without risk. >>> Oops, I was thinking about the URI skip list bug, not rfc-ignorant. >>

Re: Two bugs left just needing 1 vote for 3.3.2 Re: Proposal: 3.3.2-rc1

On 05/12/2011 12:24 PM, Mark Martinec wrote: Warren wrote: 6526 is not critical, it could be fixed after rc1 or anytime later in sa-update without risk. Oops, I was thinking about the URI skip list bug, not rfc-ignorant. I think the state of affairs is good enough for a rc1 cut now, the rest

Re: Two bugs left just needing 1 vote for 3.3.2 Re: Proposal: 3.3.2-rc1

Warren wrote: > > 6526 is not critical, it could be fixed after rc1 or anytime later in > > sa-update without risk. > Oops, I was thinking about the URI skip list bug, not rfc-ignorant. I think the state of affairs is good enough for a rc1 cut now, the rest can be settled later. Make

Re: Two bugs left just needing 1 vote for 3.3.2 Re: Proposal: 3.3.2-rc1

On 5/12/2011 11:49 AM, Warren Togami Jr. wrote: On 5/12/2011 3:37 AM, Mark Martinec wrote: > Everyone ready for a 3.3.2-rc1 cut late Thursday? Working on a Bug 6515, will have it ready soon. Other than that, it's fine with me. If we strike some solution for Bug 6526 (Disable rfc-ignorant.org)

Re: Two bugs left just needing 1 vote for 3.3.2 Re: Proposal: 3.3.2-rc1

On 5/12/2011 3:37 AM, Mark Martinec wrote: > Everyone ready for a 3.3.2-rc1 cut late Thursday? Working on a Bug 6515, will have it ready soon. Other than that, it's fine with me. If we strike some solution for Bug 6526 (Disable rfc-ignorant.org) by then, even better. Mark 6526 is not c

Jenkins build is back to stable : SpamAssassin-trunk #7007

See

[Bug 6515] [review] spamd timeout_child option overrides time_limit configuration option with nastier behaviour

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6515 Mark Martinec changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 6515] [review] spamd timeout_child option overrides time_limit configuration option with nastier behaviour

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6515 Henrik Krohns changed: What|Removed |Added CC||h...@hege.li Status Whiteboard

Jenkins build became unstable: SpamAssassin-trunk #7006

See

[Bug 6515] [review] spamd timeout_child option overrides time_limit configuration option with nastier behaviour

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6515 --- Comment #13 from Mark Martinec 2011-05-12 17:11:04 UTC --- Forgot to commit one detail into trunk: lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/Check.pm -$pms->got_hit('TIME_LIMIT_EXCEEDED', '', score => 0.001, +$pms->got_hit('TIME_LIMIT_E

[Bug 6515] [review] spamd timeout_child option overrides time_limit configuration option with nastier behaviour

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6515 --- Comment #12 from Kevin A. McGrail 2011-05-12 16:39:17 UTC --- > > My opinion is that it should be set to -99 because if you run out > > of time and haven't gotten to any negative scoring rules, the time > > out causes a FP. > > In

[Bug 6515] [review] spamd timeout_child option overrides time_limit configuration option with nastier behaviour

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6515 Mark Martinec changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|Undefined |3.3.2 Status Whiteboard|

[Bug 6515] [review] spamd timeout_child option overrides time_limit configuration option with nastier behaviour

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6515 Mark Martinec changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|spamd timeout_child option |[review] spamd

[Bug 6515] spamd timeout_child option overrides time_limit configuration option with nastier behaviour

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6515 --- Comment #10 from Mark Martinec 2011-05-12 15:58:43 UTC --- trunk: Bug 6515: spamd timeout_child option overrides time_limit configuration option with nastier behaviour Sending lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf.pm Sending lib/Mail/SpamA

[Bug 6515] spamd timeout_child option overrides time_limit configuration option with nastier behaviour

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6515 --- Comment #9 from Mark Martinec 2011-05-12 15:56:04 UTC --- Sorry for coming late for the show. I haven't noticed the spamd problem as I mostly run SpamAssassin from amavisd and the time limiting worked fine there, and my limited test

[Bug 6515] spamd timeout_child option overrides time_limit configuration option with nastier behaviour

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6515 --- Comment #8 from Kevin A. McGrail 2011-05-12 15:41:54 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > Created attachment 4884 [details] > proposed patch, essentially as per comment 1, with docs update +1. I really like the default score overrid

[Bug 6515] spamd timeout_child option overrides time_limit configuration option with nastier behaviour

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6515 --- Comment #7 from Mark Martinec 2011-05-12 15:27:56 UTC --- Created attachment 4884 --> https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=4884 proposed patch, essentially as per comment 1, with docs update -- Configure bugm

[Bug 6490] [review] Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF - Two enhancement issues

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6490 --- Comment #42 from Kevin A. McGrail 2011-05-12 13:56:12 UTC --- > > Trunk: > > Deleting rules/v340.pre > > The v340.pre is needed because of its: > loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::AskDNS > Please put it back to trunk,

Re: Two bugs left just needing 1 vote for 3.3.2 Re: Proposal: 3.3.2-rc1

On 5/12/2011 9:48 AM, Yet Another Ninja wrote: On 2011-05-12 15:37, Mark Martinec wrote: > Everyone ready for a 3.3.2-rc1 cut late Thursday? I've reviewed everything on my list and fine here. Will be nice to get back on track and get the 5.12 perl warnings resolved. If we strike some soluti

[Bug 6490] [review] Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF - Two enhancement issues

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6490 --- Comment #41 from Mark Martinec 2011-05-12 13:50:45 UTC --- > 3.3 branch: > Deleting rules/v332.pre > Trunk: > Deleting rules/v332.pre Thanks. > Trunk: > Deleting rules/v340.pre The v340.pre is needed becaus

[Bug 6526] Disable rfc-ignorant.org

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6526 Kevin A. McGrail changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|3.3.2 |3.4.0 -- Configure bugmail:

[Bug 6526] Disable rfc-ignorant.org

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6526 --- Comment #43 from Kevin A. McGrail 2011-05-12 13:48:29 UTC --- Pre Files removed for v332 and v340 and added to local.cf for consideration in trunk. Removing v332.pre in 3.3 branch as that's clearly wrong. 3.3 branch: Deleting

Re: Two bugs left just needing 1 vote for 3.3.2 Re: Proposal: 3.3.2-rc1

On 2011-05-12 15:37, Mark Martinec wrote: > Everyone ready for a 3.3.2-rc1 cut late Thursday? Working on a Bug 6515, will have it ready soon. Other than that, it's fine with me. If we strike some solution for Bug 6526 (Disable rfc-ignorant.org) by then, even better. Mark iirc, some tim

[Bug 6490] [review] Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF - Two enhancement issues

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6490 --- Comment #40 from Kevin A. McGrail 2011-05-12 13:44:25 UTC --- Pre Files removed for v332 and v340 and added to local.cf for consideration in trunk. Removeing v332.pre in 3.3 branch as that's clearly wrong. 3.3 branch: Deleting

Re: Two bugs left just needing 1 vote for 3.3.2 Re: Proposal: 3.3.2-rc1

> Everyone ready for a 3.3.2-rc1 cut late Thursday? Working on a Bug 6515, will have it ready soon. Other than that, it's fine with me. If we strike some solution for Bug 6526 (Disable rfc-ignorant.org) by then, even better. Mark

[Bug 6464] rpad needs its first argument to be of type text and not bytearray

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6464 Mark Martinec changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|Undefined |3.4.0 -- Configure bugmail: h

mass-check -learn

Hi, I have a question regarding mass-check parameter -learn. I want mass-check to learn from 50% of my database, and then to apply bayes rules on the other half of my corpus. So the command running mass-check looks like this : ./mass-check --progress --bayes -j 2 --all --learn=50 --restart=400

Re: Two bugs left just needing 1 vote for 3.3.2 Re: Proposal: 3.3.2-rc1

On 5/11/2011 3:49 AM, Yet Another Ninja wrote: On 2011-05-11 15:48, Mark Martinec wrote: Warren writes: Password is reset. How about we cut whatever is in svn on Thursday? I have an important thing happening Wednesday, currently busy prepping for. Fine with me. The Bug 6236 is bugging me, bu