https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6648
Henrik Krohns changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||h...@hege.li
--- Comment #9 fro
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6648
D. Stussy changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||software+spamassassin@kd6lv
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6648
--- Comment #7 from D. Stussy
2011-08-12 05:10:22 UTC ---
Created attachment 4951
--> https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=4951
My "20_mtx.cf" file
This is what I've decided to use in the meantime as configuration
Howdy,
Can someone set MichaelParker up with wiki privs.
Thanks
Michael
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6648
--- Comment #6 from Darxus 2011-08-12 04:21:02 UTC ---
Please forgive my over-enthusiasm. Increasing the default threshold, and
penalizing people for not using MTX while it's not more widely implemented, are
both bad ideas.
So how abou
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6648
--- Comment #5 from Darxus 2011-08-12 03:13:57 UTC ---
Ooh, more fun idea:
Continue generating test scores with a threshold of 5, but set SA default
threshold to 5.1, then include MTX with MTX_NONE set to 0.1. Then you cause no
additio
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 20:09:08 +,
bugzilla-dae...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org wrote:
a half ago, and it has changed very little since then. The change
history is
here: http://www.chaosreigns.com/mtx/#plugin
another exsample on loadplugin in cf files :(
should be pre file that holds it
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6648
--- Comment #4 from Darxus 2011-08-12 02:50:39 UTC ---
(Oops.)
Test harness output:
http://www.chaosreigns.com/mtx/testmtx.txt
Tests 12 different combinations of MTX records, MTX Policy records, and MTX
blacklist values, through SpamAss
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6648
--- Comment #3 from Darxus 2011-08-12 02:39:31 UTC ---
A couple new things to maybe encourage you to include this in SpamAssassin:
--
Configure bugmail:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are re
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 18:12:06 -0400, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
Anybody know why this page on the wiki says this works? Does it
actually
work anywhere?
in foo.pre:
loadplugin foo foo.pm
in foo.pm:
package foo
...
workds here just fine, but dont put loadplugin in cf files dammit :)
On 2011-08-12 0:12, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CustomPlugins says, twice, that the
perl modules for plugins can be kept in /etc/mail/spamassassin (aka
/etc/spamassassin, depending on your install). Just finally tried it,
and it didn't work. Perl complains
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CustomPlugins says, twice, that the
perl modules for plugins can be kept in /etc/mail/spamassassin (aka
/etc/spamassassin, depending on your install). Just finally tried it,
and it didn't work. Perl complains that it can't find the file in its
module path, list
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6648
--- Comment #2 from Darxus 2011-08-11 20:09:08 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Certainly looks interesting. Is MTX on a standards track?
Thanks, I think it's great. No, I haven't begun the RFC process.
And I do agree that it's ma
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6612
D. Stussy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6611
D. Stussy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6610
D. Stussy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6648
Kevin A. McGrail changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kmcgr...@pccc.com
--- Commen
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6648
Bug #: 6648
Summary: "MTX" solution to identify authorized mail servers.
Product: Spamassassin
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
URL: http://www.chaosreigns.com/mtx/
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6643
D. Stussy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #6 from D. Stuss
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6643
Darxus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6647
Darxus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dar...@chaosreigns.com
--- Comment #1
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6525
--- Comment #33 from D. Stussy
2011-08-11 18:31:39 UTC ---
RE: Reply #32. I looked at what the DNSBL said and attempted removal for you
as well. The system told me you were only listed last week (04 Aug 2011) and
that automatic remov
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6603
Darxus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6647
Bug #: 6647
Summary: Sync Debian packaging from v3.3.2-1 to trunk
Product: Spamassassin
Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
S
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6525
Ben Dugdale changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||b...@co.apache.az.us
--- Comment
Yeah, but the changes are almost entirely the changes I already made last
time I synced it to trunk due to Debian patches having been applied to
trunk no-longer being necessary in the Debian packaging. And some little
change to a readme. Still planning to do it though.
That's what I hoped. So
On 08/11, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> There are plenty of people using SVN checkouts for production
> systems. I would keep it in sync as best you can.
Yeah, but the changes are almost entirely the changes I already made last
time I synced it to trunk due to Debian patches having been applied to
tr
On 2011-08-11 15:27, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 8/10/2011 9:51 PM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
Just FYI. Ubuntu had a package out something like the day after Warren
posted his official announcement of 3.3.2. Debian's was more recent, and
Ubuntu just synced from Debian.
I'm kind of planning
On 8/10/2011 9:51 PM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
Just FYI. Ubuntu had a package out something like the day after Warren
posted his official announcement of 3.3.2. Debian's was more recent, and
Ubuntu just synced from Debian.
I'm kind of planning to re-sync the packaging to SA trunk, but in
29 matches
Mail list logo