[Bug 6649] sa-compile fails on SOUGHT rule with re2c: error: line 207, column 2: unterminated string constant (missing ")

2011-09-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6649 Mark Martinec changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|Undefined |3.4.0 --- Comment #16 from Mark

Non-English accuracy Re: Rescore Masscheck for 3.4.x?

2011-09-22 Thread darxus
On 09/22, Warren Togami Jr. wrote: >On a separate note, I have a volunteer at school willing to help us build >a Mandarin language ham corpus a few months from now.  That will be >interesting to see how that throws off our statistics. =) I've been wondering about SA's accuracy on other

Rescore Masscheck for 3.4.x?

2011-09-22 Thread Warren Togami Jr.
Hey folks, Good to see that 3.4.0 is happening. Sorry I've been away for a while, grad school started and the workload is very heavy. Are we doing a rescore masscheck for 3.4.x? On a separate note, I have a volunteer at school willing to help us build a Mandarin language ham corpus a few months

[Bug 6649] sa-compile fails on SOUGHT rule with re2c: error: line 207, column 2: unterminated string constant (missing ")

2011-09-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6649 --- Comment #15 from Mark Martinec 2011-09-22 15:31:43 UTC --- rule: body __SEEK_UWCSGI /\x{de}\x{bd}\x{c9}x\@FE;\x{ba}w\x{87}T-\x{cb} \x{98}\x{e4}2\x{e2}U\x{e9}<\x{cf}\x{ed} \x{f2}r\x{f9}\x{19}\x{87}\x{b5}\x{13}\x{ef}9\*/ resu

[Bug 6649] sa-compile fails on SOUGHT rule with re2c: error: line 207, column 2: unterminated string constant (missing ")

2011-09-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6649 --- Comment #14 from Mark Martinec 2011-09-22 15:22:35 UTC --- > Created attachment 4964 [details] > another problematic re2c input file from the sought ruleset Right, the re2c crashes with a core dump. The culprit line is: "\336\2

[Bug 6663] Use unsigned database fields for int

2011-09-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6663 Michiel Hazelhof changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #4965|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug 6663] Use unsigned database fields for int

2011-09-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6663 --- Comment #9 from Michiel Hazelhof 2011-09-22 08:27:50 UTC --- Created attachment 4968 --> https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=4968 userpref_mysql #1 -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssass

[Bug 6663] Use unsigned database fields for int

2011-09-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6663 --- Comment #8 from Michiel Hazelhof 2011-09-22 08:27:32 UTC --- Created attachment 4967 --> https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=4967 bayes_mysql #1 -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/

[Bug 6663] Use unsigned database fields for int

2011-09-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6663 --- Comment #7 from Michiel Hazelhof 2011-09-22 08:27:15 UTC --- Created attachment 4966 --> https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=4966 New revision #1 -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin

[Bug 6663] Use unsigned database fields for int

2011-09-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6663 --- Comment #6 from Michiel Hazelhof 2011-09-22 08:26:57 UTC --- Sorry I forgot to add the sql file. Setting fields like bayes_token.id to unsigned , allows them to contain higher numbers and potentially avoid some problems. All fields

[Bug 6663] Use unsigned database fields for int

2011-09-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6663 --- Comment #5 from Michiel Hazelhof 2011-09-22 08:04:55 UTC --- Created attachment 4965 --> https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=4965 Test for the sql tables -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/Spam