https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6674
Adam Katz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||antis...@khopis.com
--- Comment #9
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6400
--- Comment #4 from Warren Togami 2011-10-13 19:55:55 UTC
---
Adding Mailspike is not a simple matter of adding Mailspike. In order to
properly include Mailspike we need a full rescore run, as its addition will
effect the score of othe
I assume people are just too busy to cut a 3.4.0 pre-release and ask
the public for testing?
If this is the case, then I will do it probably this weekend. I'd
like to call it rc1 to encourage public testing, but if folks here
object then I'll call it beta1 or test1.
Hi Warren,
I don't th
Hey folks,
I assume people are just too busy to cut a 3.4.0 pre-release and ask the
public for testing?
If this is the case, then I will do it probably this weekend. I'd like to
call it rc1 to encourage public testing, but if folks here object then I'll
call it beta1 or test1.
Warren
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6672
--- Comment #13 from Kris Deugau 2011-10-13 19:23:08 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> How about having spamc log something like that to syslog? spamd logs the
> processing of the messages, it seems reasonable to me that spamc should
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6674
--- Comment #8 from Darxus 2011-10-13 19:18:13 UTC ---
Just so others don't need to dig up these links:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CustomRulesets lists a "Polish Language
Ruleset" at http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/BodyTests
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6674
--- Comment #7 from Darxus 2011-10-13 19:14:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> 1) I can start maintaining these rules as CustomRuleset, I see that "Polish
> Language Ruleset" is empty and Status is "?". I just need to know what shall
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6674
--- Comment #6 from D. Stussy
2011-10-13 19:00:21 UTC ---
I concur: A custom ruleset with its own update channel is the way to go for
all non-English languages (with very limited exceptions).
The most common exception being when Engli
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6672
--- Comment #12 from Karsten Bräckelmann 2011-10-13
18:39:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> spamc -c -s 2048000 seems to do the trick.
>
> Is there any advantage to having procmail only do this if the file is over the
> 512K defaul
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6674
Lemat changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||le...@lemat.priv.pl
--- Comment #5 from
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6672
--- Comment #11 from Karsten Bräckelmann 2011-10-13
18:15:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> > [...] spamc is a lightweight client for spamd, deliberately "dumb"
> > if you want to say so, and passes on what spamd passed back.
> A
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6672
--- Comment #10 from John Hardin 2011-10-13 17:41:12 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #6)
> > > By default, spamc will not
> > > pass a message on to spamd if it's over 512K. It will also not add any
> > > X-Spam
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6675
Bug #: 6675
Summary: HTML_TITLE_SUBJ_DIFF hits subject "<3"
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.4.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: nor
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6674
--- Comment #4 from AXB 2011-10-13 17:09:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> So you actually think it's appropriate for spamassassin to only be useful in
> English? That seems pretty wrong to me.
When 99% of the spam is in English I
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6674
--- Comment #3 from Darxus 2011-10-13 16:59:04 UTC ---
So you actually think it's appropriate for spamassassin to only be useful in
English? That seems pretty wrong to me.
Although it's a good point that without any Polish data coming
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6674
--- Comment #2 from AXB 2011-10-13 16:51:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Seems like these should be added to the default rule set? Lots of language
> specific rules in there already, mostly English.
Imo, such specific regional ru
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6674
Darxus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dar...@chaosreigns.com
--- Comment #1
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6673
Darxus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dar...@chaosreigns.com
--- Comment #2
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6673
Kevin A. McGrail changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6672
Kevin A. McGrail changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6672
--- Comment #8 from Louis LeBlanc 2011-10-13 14:47:30
UTC ---
spamc -c -s 2048000 seems to do the trick.
Is there any advantage to having procmail only do this if the file is over the
512K default threshold, or would just adding the -s
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6674
Marcin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||b...@mejor.pl
--
Configure bugmail:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6674
Bug #: 6674
Summary: new rules for polish users
Product: Spamassassin
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhanceme
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6673
Lemat changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://wiki.apache.org/spam
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6673
Bug #: 6673
Summary: SA Wiki incorrect URL
Product: Spamassassin
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=3500
Pavel Sidlo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pavel.si...@topdigital.cz
--
Con
26 matches
Mail list logo
