https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6839
Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6841
Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6841
Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|Undefined |3.4.0
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6842
Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6840
Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6822
--- Comment #6 from AXB axb.li...@gmail.com ---
I'd like to work on this as well.
Can we use your version at
http://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/auto-mass-check.git/tree/ to get started? A
simple unified masscheck script will be very
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6838
--- Comment #15 from Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com ---
Based on the number of complaints, I've removed Daryl's mirror temporarily from
the MIRRORED.BY file by updating the file on minotaur and then doing svn update
on zones based on
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6839
--- Comment #3 from Darxus dar...@chaosreigns.com ---
Downstream :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6838
--- Comment #16 from Martin von Wittich martin.von.witt...@iserv.eu ---
Thanks! If I find the time, I'll have a look into sa-update and see if I can
come up with a patch.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6822
--- Comment #7 from Nick Bebout n...@bebout.net ---
Yes that is fine. I've already signed the Apache CLA and the auto-mass-check
files are Apache licensed already
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6822
--- Comment #8 from AXB axb.li...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Yes that is fine. I've already signed the Apache CLA and the
auto-mass-check files are Apache licensed already
Thank Nick
I'll commit my work in progress to
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6843
Priority: P2
Bug ID: 6843
Assignee: dev@spamassassin.apache.org
Summary: Possible Spamd option bug
Severity: normal
Classification: Unclassified
OS: Windows 7
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6839
--- Comment #4 from Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Downstream :)
Silly me. Yes, downstream. Today's score: Darxus 1 - KAM 0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6822
--- Comment #9 from Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com ---
Alex,
Can you commit your version to masses/contrib please and make it a subdir?
Right now, here's what I think we have for masscheck:
masses/mass-check - JM's original
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6822
--- Comment #10 from AXB axb.li...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #9)
Alex,
Can you commit your version to masses/contrib please and make it a subdir?
Right now, here's what I think we have for masscheck:
masses/mass-check
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6844
Priority: P2
Bug ID: 6844
Assignee: dev@spamassassin.apache.org
Summary: Almost-overlapping rules for bad OE version causing
FP
Severity: normal
Classification:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6844
--- Comment #1 from AXB axb.li...@gmail.com ---
Apparently the sender is using an ancient (insecure) OE version and should be
upgraded. Iirc this version was EOL in 2002.
OE msg should include both headers as:
X-Mailer: Microsoft
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6844
--- Comment #2 from AXB axb.li...@gmail.com ---
Please see http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/ SPAM% HAM% for each rule.
While there is overlap, it can vary (a lot) depending on the submitted corpus
data.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6843
RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6841
Dan Mahoney sab...@gushi.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sab...@gushi.org
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6844
Kris Deugau kdeu...@vianet.ca changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6844
--- Comment #4 from AXB axb.li...@gmail.com ---
We'll check FSL_UA / FSL_XM_419
AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 is autogenerated
These rules are basically dead safe to even use them to reject mail at smtp
level.
user is an ISP customer
I recently got a false positive largely due to this rule:
* 3.0 SUBJ_YOUR_DEBT Subject contains Your Bills or similar
I think it's interesting that a rule can get scored so high when it hits
more ham than spam:
MSECSSPAM% HAM% S/ORANK SCORE NAME WHO/AGE
0
See https://builds.apache.org/job/SpamAssassin-trunk/8042/changes
24 matches
Mail list logo