Re: [auto] bad sandbox rules report

2013-03-06 Thread Axb
Guys, I'm disabling 0 hit/non perfomers/abandoned rules in hstern's sandbox. make test spit out: STOX_REPLY_TYPE_WITHOUT_QUOTES depends on __HS_SUBJ_RE_FW which is nonexistent STOX_REPLY_TYPE_WITHOUT_QUOTES depends on __HS_QUOTE which is nonexistent FROM_12LTRDOM depends on __HS_SUBJ_RE_FW

Re: [auto] bad sandbox rules report

2013-03-06 Thread Axb
On 03/06/2013 10:19 AM, Axb wrote: Guys, I'm disabling 0 hit/non perfomers/abandoned rules in hstern's sandbox. make test spit out: STOX_REPLY_TYPE_WITHOUT_QUOTES depends on __HS_SUBJ_RE_FW which is nonexistent STOX_REPLY_TYPE_WITHOUT_QUOTES depends on __HS_QUOTE which is nonexistent

[Bug 6914] New: sa-update problem probably on ipv6

2013-03-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6914 Bug ID: 6914 Summary: sa-update problem probably on ipv6 Product: Spamassassin Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: Windows 7 Status: NEW

[Bug 6914] sa-update problem probably on ipv6

2013-03-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6914 Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 6914] sa-update problem probably on ipv6

2013-03-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6914 darius1706 r...@starnet.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug 6914] sa-update problem probably on ipv6

2013-03-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6914 --- Comment #3 from Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com --- Are you using trunk because ipv6-only isn't supported on older versions? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 6914] sa-update problem probably on ipv6

2013-03-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6914 --- Comment #4 from darius1706 r...@starnet.cz --- (In reply to comment #3) Are you using trunk because ipv6-only isn't supported on older versions? What do you mean trunk. I have direct ipv6 connection, latest version of all software

Re: [auto] bad sandbox rules report

2013-03-06 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 3/6/2013 4:54 AM, Axb wrote: I've copied the dependencies to jm and jhardin sandboxes. Suggest you rename them so they're unique to your rules and/or put them in a commitername_dependencies.cf file I like getting rid of the rules that aren't working. But this copying rules in sandbox

[Bug 6914] sa-update problem probably on ipv6

2013-03-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6914 --- Comment #5 from darius1706 r...@starnet.cz --- (In reply to comment #4) (In reply to comment #3) Are you using trunk because ipv6-only isn't supported on older versions? What do you mean trunk. I have direct ipv6 connection,

[Bug 6914] sa-update problem probably on ipv6

2013-03-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6914 --- Comment #6 from Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com --- trunk is a term in revision control software http://stackoverflow.com/questions/698313/what-is-trunk-branch-and-tag-in-subversion If you are on an ipv6-only system, you need to

[Bug 6914] sa-update problem probably on ipv6

2013-03-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6914 --- Comment #7 from darius1706 r...@starnet.cz --- (In reply to comment #6) trunk is a term in revision control software http://stackoverflow.com/questions/698313/what-is-trunk-branch-and-tag-in- subversion If you are on an

[Bug 6914] sa-update problem probably on ipv6

2013-03-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6914 darius1706 r...@starnet.cz changed: What|Removed |Added OS|Windows 7 |FreeBSD -- You

Re: [auto] bad sandbox rules report

2013-03-06 Thread Axb
On 03/06/2013 11:55 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: On 3/6/2013 4:54 AM, Axb wrote: I've copied the dependencies to jm and jhardin sandboxes. Suggest you rename them so they're unique to your rules and/or put them in a commitername_dependencies.cf file I like getting rid of the rules that aren't

[Bug 6914] sa-update problem probably on ipv6

2013-03-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6914 Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug 6914] sa-update problem probably on ipv6

2013-03-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6914 darius1706 r...@starnet.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug 6914] sa-update problem probably on ipv6

2013-03-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6914 Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug 6899] Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF should have support for Authentication-Results headers

2013-03-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6899 Alessandro Vesely ves...@tana.it changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

Re: Authentication-Results: saving a few cycles

2013-03-06 Thread Alessandro Vesely
On Tue 05/Mar/2013 20:59:08 +0100 Benny Pedersen wrote: Alessandro Vesely skrev den 2013-03-04 18:47: Authentication-Results: wmail.tana.it; dnswl=pass dns.zone=list.dnswl.org policy.ip=127.0.11.1 Worth? if software that adds this header is opensource then yes, same as my bug

[Bug 6914] sa-update problem probably on ipv6

2013-03-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6914 --- Comment #11 from Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com --- The user was running 3.3.2 and this helped him with his temporary issue: dig -t txt 2.3.3.updates.spamassassin.org get the version. i.e. 2.3.3.updates.spamassassin.org.

[Bug 5503] [REVIEW] FR: autolearn_force will force Bayes learning according to tflag setting

2013-03-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5503 --- Comment #12 from Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com --- So just re-reading this bug. If I read the extra comments, it does work but you would like more debug / output changes, correct? -- You are receiving this mail because: You

Re: [auto] bad sandbox rules report

2013-03-06 Thread John Hardin
On Wed, 6 Mar 2013, Axb wrote: If your rules depend on sandbox rules which are not in your own, PLEASE always copy these rules to your own sandbox. This will avoid suprises in the future. It also can lead to problems if the owner of that rule modifies their original copy, but I see your

Re: [auto] bad sandbox rules report

2013-03-06 Thread John Hardin
On Wed, 6 Mar 2013, Axb wrote: I've copied the dependencies to jm and jhardin sandboxes. Suggest you rename them so they're unique to your rules and/or put them in a commitername_dependencies.cf file Thanks! -- John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/

[Bug 5503] [REVIEW] FR: autolearn_force will force Bayes learning according to tflag setting

2013-03-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5503 --- Comment #13 from AXB axb.li...@gmail.com --- (In reply to comment #12) So just re-reading this bug. If I read the extra comments, it does work but you would like more debug / output changes, correct? yep. especially spamd

[Bug 6915] New: PerMsgStatus::get_tag() enhancement and optimization

2013-03-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6915 Bug ID: 6915 Summary: PerMsgStatus::get_tag() enhancement and optimization Product: Spamassassin Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version) Hardware: PC OS: All

[Bug 6915] PerMsgStatus::get_tag() enhancement and optimization

2013-03-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6915 --- Comment #1 from Mark Martinec mark.marti...@ijs.si --- trunk: Sending lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Message/Metadata.pm Sending lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Message.pm Sending lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm Sending

[Bug 6916] New: Spamassassin crashes on one particular mail message

2013-03-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6916 Bug ID: 6916 Summary: Spamassassin crashes on one particular mail message Product: Spamassassin Version: 3.3.2 Hardware: PC OS: Linux Status: NEW

[Bug 6916] Spamassassin crashes on one particular mail message

2013-03-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6916 --- Comment #1 from AXB axb.li...@gmail.com --- for developers to reproduce please add the msg which caused this as well as - SpamAssassin version - OS distro version - what glue are you using to send the msg to spamd - spamd -D

[Bug 6916] Spamassassin crashes on one particular mail message

2013-03-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6916 --- Comment #2 from Michael Peek p...@nimbios.org --- Created attachment 5137 -- https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=5137action=edit Output from spamd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee

[Bug 6916] Spamassassin crashes on one particular mail message

2013-03-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6916 Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 6916] Spamassassin crashes on one particular mail message

2013-03-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6916 Michael Peek p...@nimbios.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||p...@nimbios.org

[Bug 6916] Spamassassin crashes on one particular mail message

2013-03-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6916 --- Comment #5 from Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com --- A) Scanning a file of the size you are talking about likely just isn't going to work. You listed 268,435,456 bytes B) We can't support exim. That's a separate product.

[Bug 6915] PerMsgStatus::get_tag() enhancement and optimization

2013-03-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6915 Mark Martinec mark.marti...@ijs.si changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|Undefined |3.4.0 ---