https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7166
Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Jenkins fails trunk, can't |Jenkins fails
See https://builds.apache.org/job/SpamAssassin-trunk/9851/changes
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7166
--- Comment #6 from Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com ---
(In reply to Mark Martinec from comment #5)
We shouldn't be hiding the problem under the carpet.
I have not marked the ticket resolved ;-) Just gathering more data if it does
in
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7166
--- Comment #7 from Mark Martinec mark.marti...@ijs.si ---
I have not marked the ticket resolved ;-) Just gathering more data if it
does in fact fix the issue. Which is also why I documented in the note.
Ok.
But why WOULD
See https://builds.apache.org/job/SpamAssassin-trunk/changes
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7101
--- Comment #15 from Mark Martinec mark.marti...@ijs.si ---
Committed revision 1671093.
Allowed via as a substitute for with when checking received headers.
Testing attachment 5251 [details] on trunk scores it at a cool 0.1.
Should now
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7166
--- Comment #8 from Mark Martinec mark.marti...@ijs.si ---
added debug for clear_util_rb config option,
reverted r1672188,
added missing backquotes for dots in regexps in t/uri_text.t,
enabled debugging in t/uri_text.t to see what is going
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7166
--- Comment #5 from Mark Martinec mark.marti...@ijs.si ---
However, uri text still fails and fails on the two tests for .tp just
recently changed
The most likely explanation is what Joe Quinn already suggested
in the opening post, namely
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5590
Mark Martinec mark.marti...@ijs.si changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
See https://builds.apache.org/job/SpamAssassin-trunk/changes
See https://builds.apache.org/job/SpamAssassin-trunk/9849/changes
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6782
--- Comment #27 from Michael Parker park...@pobox.com ---
It ran faster on 5.8 because regex support changed in the 5.10 timeframe and
generally ended up slower.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7166
--- Comment #4 from Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com ---
After a distclean, I recant my previous statement. dnsbl.t appears resolved and
jenkins concurs.
However, uri text still fails and fails on the two tests for .tp just recently
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7167
Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
See https://builds.apache.org/job/SpamAssassin-trunk/changes
SpamAssassin version 3.3.0 has not had a rule update since 2015-04-01.
SpamAssassin version 3.3.1 has not had a rule update since 2015-04-01.
SpamAssassin version 3.3.2 has not had a rule update since 2015-04-01.
20150407: Spam or ham is below threshold of 150,000:
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6303
Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6455
Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
HTTP get: http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/1-days-ago?xml=1
HTTP get: http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/2-days-ago?xml=1
HTTP get: http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/3-days-ago?xml=1
Bad performing rules, from the past 3 night's mass-checks.
(Note: 'net' rules will be listed as 'no hits' unless you set
See https://builds.apache.org/job/SpamAssassin-trunk/changes
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5998
Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7169
Bug ID: 7169
Summary: SPF_PERMERROR documentation
Product: Spamassassin
Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7168
Bug ID: 7168
Summary: More POD errors and warnings
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.4 SVN branch
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6782
--- Comment #24 from Henrik Krohns h...@hege.li ---
Fixed bug detected from dnsbl.t
SendingPerMsgStatus.pm
Transmitting file data .
Committed revision 1672078.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
See https://builds.apache.org/job/SpamAssassin-trunk/changes
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7167
Bug ID: 7167
Summary: NAME_EMAIL_DIFF should not be case-sensitive
Product: Spamassassin
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7167
--- Comment #1 from Mark Martinec mark.marti...@ijs.si ---
I suggest changing the subrule __NAME_EQ_EMAIL to be case-insensitive.
--- rulesrc/sandbox/khopesh/20_khop_experimental.cf~ 2015-04-08
20:26:46.479635000 +0200
+++
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7150
Mark Martinec mark.marti...@ijs.si changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7166
--- Comment #2 from Mark Martinec mark.marti...@ijs.si ---
Created attachment 5293
-- https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=5293action=edit
missing backslash-quote on dots and @ in test patterns
Btw, in t/uri_text.t these
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6782
Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6782
--- Comment #25 from Joe Quinn jquinn+sa...@pccc.com ---
As a side note on Henrik's patch by the way, even though it notes the trie
optimization in 5.10.1, our testing on 5.8.8 completed faster than our newer
perl versions, on the same
31 matches
Mail list logo
