[Bug 7610] Don't say "DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid" just because module missing!

2018-09-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7610 John Hardin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jhar...@impsec.org --- Comment #3 fro

[Bug 7609] Augment the rule publishing scripts & sa-update to create SHA-512 files and use them as well

2018-09-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7609 Bill Cole changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED CC|

[Bug 7610] Don't say "DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid" just because module missing!

2018-09-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7610 --- Comment #2 from jida...@jidanni.org --- So say 0.0 T_DKIM_UNTESTED DKIM-Signature header exists but Mail::DKIM Perl module is not installed to test it or something, if anything. And retire T_DKIM_INVALID which is a mess, and crea

[Bug 7610] Don't say "DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid" just because module missing!

2018-09-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7610 jida...@jidanni.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jida...@jidanni.org --- Commen

[Bug 7610] New: Don't say "DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid" just because module missing!

2018-09-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7610 Bug ID: 7610 Summary: Don't say "DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid" just because module missing! Product: Spamassassin Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)

SpamAssassin 3.4.2 Pre-Release 5

2018-09-01 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
We are working through more bugs but I'm very pleased with the documentation for a build. It is working well with the new rule update infrastructure and the removal of rules from 3.4 as well as incorporates signing with SHA256 & SHA512. sha256sum of archive files: 76353c6121eba2155ecf2b6dbb820

[Bug 7596] Update distribution to satisfy new Apache policies, including replacing SHA-1 checksums with SHA-256 or SHA-512

2018-09-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7596 Kevin A. McGrail changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

Re: weekly masscheck blew up

2018-09-01 Thread Axb
On 09/01/2018 07:55 PM, Bill Cole wrote: On 1 Sep 2018, at 7:31 (-0400), Axb wrote: My weekly masscheck blew up a while ago.. Bareword found where operator expected at /data/masscheckwork/weekly_mass_check/masses/../lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Util.pm line 770, near "s/\t/    /gr" Bareword fou

Re: weekly masscheck blew up

2018-09-01 Thread Bill Cole
On 1 Sep 2018, at 7:31 (-0400), Axb wrote: My weekly masscheck blew up a while ago.. Bareword found where operator expected at /data/masscheckwork/weekly_mass_check/masses/../lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Util.pm line 770, near "s/\t//gr" Bareword found where operator expected at /data/massc

[Bug 7609] Augment the rule publishing scripts & sa-update to create SHA-512 files and use them as well

2018-09-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7609 Kevin A. McGrail changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |blocker CC|

[Bug 7609] New: Augment the rule publishing scripts & sa-update to create SHA-512 files and use them as well

2018-09-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7609 Bug ID: 7609 Summary: Augment the rule publishing scripts & sa-update to create SHA-512 files and use them as well Product: Spamassassin Version: unspecified Hardware:

[Bug 7268] people.apache.org being replaced by home.apache.org

2018-09-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7268 Kevin A. McGrail changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kmcgr...@apache.org

Re: weekly masscheck blew up

2018-09-01 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 9/1/2018 7:31 AM, Axb wrote: > My weekly masscheck blew up a while ago.. > > Bareword found where operator expected at > /data/masscheckwork/weekly_mass_check/masses/../lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Util.pm > line 770, near "s/\t/    /gr" > Bareword found where operator expected at > /data/masscheck

weekly masscheck blew up

2018-09-01 Thread Axb
My weekly masscheck blew up a while ago.. Bareword found where operator expected at /data/masscheckwork/weekly_mass_check/masses/../lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Util.pm line 770, near "s/\t//gr" Bareword found where operator expected at /data/masscheckwork/weekly_mass_check/masses/../lib/Mail