https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7826
--- Comment #58 from Kevin A. McGrail ---
(In reply to John Hardin from comment #57)
> (In reply to Kevin A. McGrail from comment #55)
>
> > This isn't a plugin to disable features (i.e. deprecate), it's to enable
> > them.
>
> So name it
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7826
--- Comment #57 from John Hardin ---
(In reply to Kevin A. McGrail from comment #55)
> This isn't a plugin to disable features (i.e. deprecate), it's to enable them.
So name it "EnableDeprecatedTerminology.pm"
I second the objection to "R
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7826
--- Comment #56 from Kevin A. McGrail ---
(In reply to Loren Wilton from comment #53)
> I have to say ...
This is a bug forum not a discussion forum. Discussions belong on-list.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assigne
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7826
--- Comment #55 from Kevin A. McGrail ---
(In reply to Giovanni Bechis from comment #54)
> I would prefer a Deprecate.pm plugin, it could be useful in the future too
> if we would like to deprecate other keywords or plugins.
Have a look at
20200731: Spam or ham is below threshold of 150,000:
http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?daterev=20200731
20200731: Spam: 1402578, Ham: 131826
The spam and ham counts on which this script alerts are from
http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?daterev=20200731
Click "(source details)" (it's tiny and low
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7826
--- Comment #54 from Giovanni Bechis ---
I would prefer a Deprecate.pm plugin, it could be useful in the future too if
we would like to deprecate other keywords or plugins.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for t
