https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7981
--- Comment #15 from Sidney Markowitz ---
(In reply to Henrik Krohns from comment #11)
> Maybe time for pre2 soon?
I'm seeing agreement for a pre2, but I would like clarification about where we
are with bug #7987 which is listed as an open
Any objections enabling HashBL plugin by default for new installs?
I think it's going to be useful in the future with all the new features.
Only rule in stock rules using it at the moment is GB_HASHBL_BTC, but there
will probably be more and we should make sure it can be easily used if
needed.
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 07:04:53PM +0300, Henrik K wrote:
>
> Maybe TxRep depends on some SPF stuff, but that's a can of worms I'm not
> gonna open. There should not be any reason for someone to add TXREP into a
> meta rule, so I think it's ok.
And both AWL and TXREP depend on DKIM, but should
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 04:57:59PM +0200, giova...@paclan.it wrote:
>
> I spotted the issue checking DMARC failures but other rules may be affected
> as well.
I think DMARC was the last plugin that depends on results from other
Plugins, should be fixed now.
Maybe TxRep depends on some SPF
On 5/25/22 16:12, Henrik K wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 04:04:33PM +0200, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
>> Hi,
>> meta rules starts at the lower priority of the rules they are composed by
>> (diff for regression test attached).
>>
>> If you are using a meta rule that mixes network and non network
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 05:12:30PM +0300, Henrik K wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 04:04:33PM +0200, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
> > Hi,
> > meta rules starts at the lower priority of the rules they are composed by
> > (diff for regression test attached).
> >
> > If you are using a meta rule that
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 04:04:33PM +0200, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
> Hi,
> meta rules starts at the lower priority of the rules they are composed by
> (diff for regression test attached).
>
> If you are using a meta rule that mixes network and non network tests the
> meta rule's priority will be
Hi,
meta rules starts at the lower priority of the rules they are composed by (diff
for regression test attached).
If you are using a meta rule that mixes network and non network tests the meta
rule's priority will be -100.
After some tests, it seems that if you mix DMARC rules (priority 500)
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 09:47:10AM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> Thanks Henrik,
>
> No one has ever asked a single question about a single URL shorterner domain
> nor have I seen a FP/FN from it so I'm not sure the date info is useful.
> However, please do feel free to grab that file and put
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 08:16:23AM +0300, Henrik K wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 03:12:33PM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> > While you may say it's a stretch, it is the best list I know of that exists
> > and
> > we've kept it up adding additions and removing things when needed.
>
> I
Thanks Henrik,
No one has ever asked a single question about a single URL
shorterner domain nor have I seen a FP/FN from it so I'm not sure the date
info is useful.
However, please do feel free to grab that file and put it in stock rules.
It won't cause any issues if it's in two places that I can
HTTP get: https://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/1-days-ago?xml=1
HTTP get: https://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/2-days-ago?xml=1
HTTP get: https://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/3-days-ago?xml=1
Bad performing rules, from the past 3 night's mass-checks.
(Note: 'net' rules will be listed as 'no hits' unless you
12 matches
Mail list logo
