RE: Spamassassin / Spamd speedup

2006-02-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I appreciated this idea because it is not worth to check spam mail after certain marks; as it will speed up Spamassassin. Deepak Mahajan -Original Message- From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 1:10 AM To: dev@spamassassin.apache.org Subject

Re: Serious Proposal to add AccuTechnology(tm) to SpamAssassin (SA)

2005-03-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in a README as an example of someone using the service. But then again I am an open-source purist. If it is Open Source, it should be Open Source, everything open. Such as Razor. My $0.02 Ron Ohmer Original Message: - From: Daniel Quinlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 02 Mar 2005 15:04

RE: Storable and hyperthreading

2004-12-15 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
be a BIOS Feature as well for Storable and not the actual module itself. Original Message: - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason) Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:47:30 -0800 To: dev@SpamAssassin.apache.org Subject: Storable and hyperthreading OK, so on the spamd hang bugs, we have: - a set

RE: proposal: an automated rule-qa system

2004-11-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
that may not have full knowledge of how everything works does not turn around and say I downloaded X rule from SVN and it caught Y Ham, why? Ron Original Message: - From: Chris Santerre [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 08:57:51 -0500 To: dev@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: RE

RE: Spamd is a memory hog (?)

2004-10-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the V3 version of said rules? 3. Are you taking advantage of the myriad of new features in V3 that make some of the rules for 2.x.x unnecessary? Ron Original Message: - From: Duncan Findlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 10:15:34 -0400 To: dev@spamassassin.apache.org Subject

Re: speedup for PerMsgStatus

2004-09-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That is an unreasonablly nasty retort. Original Message: - From: Daniel Quinlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 27 Sep 2004 22:53:38 -0700 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], dev@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: speedup for PerMsgStatus Loren Wilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have no idea how