weights properly. I'm also not sure about how things might change in a
situation where misclassification costs are asymmetrical as with spam
classification.
Frederik
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 01:25:16PM -0700, Daniel Quinlan wrote:
> Frederik Eaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
How are the rule weights for spamassassin generated? There is a method
called "boosting" with several associated algorithms which is
specifically aimed at combining the outputs of a collection of "weak"
classifiers into a more accurate classifier. It seems somewhat
relevant, has it been tried?
Fre
> 2. Any further questions about this or similar topics should be directed
> to the SpamAssassin users mailing list, not to here. This list is for
> developer discussions only. Don't even reply to this with an apology or
> a thank you. I'll pretend that you have replied politely and leave it at
> t
Yes, the version I have installed is 3.0.2.
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 02:19:23PM +1300, Sidney Markowitz wrote:
> Frederik Eaton wrote:
> > As developers, you might want to add that information to the
> > part of the man page I quoted
>
> I assume that you are referring to th
nding anyway. :-)
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 08:10:12AM +1300, Sidney Markowitz wrote:
> Frederik Eaton wrote:
> > Is it possible to configure spamassassin to get back the original
> > functionality of only modifying headers of spam
>
> 1. Look up the doc on rewrite_header and re
The spamassassin manual page says:
If an incoming message is tagged as spam, instead of modifying the
original message, SpamAssassin will create a new report message and
attach the original message as a message/rfc822 MIME part (ensuring the
original message is complete
Hi,
I've been using spamc/spamd as part of my mail filter, and I've run
into a few problems with the interface it provides.
1. I want to start a spamd process (as myself) if one is not already
running. At first I thought spamc should at least have an option to
automatically spawn a spamd if neces
