* dar...@chaosreigns.com :
...
> One of my questions is, does it make sense to continue to maintain bayesian
> stuff within SA at all? Or should we drop it, and encourage people to run
> a pure bayesian classifier before SA (like spamprobe), then have rules that
> read the headers from those cla
* dar...@chaosreigns.com :
> On 06/25, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
> > SpamAssassin version 3.3.0 has not had a rule update since 2012-06-22.
>
> The problem for a while was insufficient spam corpora. As of the update
> this past weekend, spam corpora is fine, but ham corpora dropped below the
