https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8288
Giovanni Bechis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC|
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8288
--- Comment #5 from Kent Oyer ---
Someone else will have to close this ticket as I don't seem to have permission
to do so
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8288
--- Comment #4 from Kent Oyer ---
Added test case and committed in r1921799
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8288
Joe Wein changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joew...@surbl.org
--- Comment #3 from Jo
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8288
Kent Oyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||k...@mxguardian.net
--- Comment #1 from
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8288
--- Comment #2 from Kent Oyer ---
Hi Joe,
Can you tell me if the attached patch fixes the issue for you?
-Kent
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8286
Kent Oyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC|
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8288
Bug ID: 8288
Summary: Listed hosts in URIs with more than two slashes
following the https: scheme will not match URI BLs
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 4.0.2
Hardware:
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8287
Kris Deugau changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kdeu...@vianet.ca
--- Comment #1 from
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8287
Bug ID: 8287
Summary: Offset score settings do not work when no score has
been explicitly set previously
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 4.0.1
Hardware: PC
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8286
Bug ID: 8286
Summary: TextCat: Ignore invisible text
Product: Spamassassin
Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
Hardware: PC
OS: Windows 10
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8265
Kent Oyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||k...@mxguardian.net
--- Comment #2 from
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8285
Kent Oyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8285
Kent Oyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #5975|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8285
Henrik Krohns changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hege+apa...@hege.li
--- Comment #3
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8285
Kent Oyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #5974|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8285
Giovanni Bechis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||giova...@paclan.it
--- Comment #1
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8110
Giovanni Bechis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8284
Giovanni Bechis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8285
Bug ID: 8285
Summary: Improve CSS color handling
Product: Spamassassin
Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
Hardware: PC
OS: Windows 10
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8284
Bug ID: 8284
Summary: MANIFEST references non existent file
lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Redirectors.pm
Product: Spamassassin
Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
Hardwa
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8283
Kent Oyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8110
--- Comment #3 from Giovanni Bechis ---
Created attachment 5972
--> https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=5972&action=edit
custom User-Agent
Proposed patch to set a custom User-Agent
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8283
Kent Oyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #5970|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8283
Henrik Krohns changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hege+apa...@hege.li
--- Comment #2
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8283
Kent Oyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||k...@mxguardian.net
--- Comment #1 from
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8283
Bug ID: 8283
Summary: Negating matches in URIDetail
Product: Spamassassin
Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
Hardware: PC
OS: Windows 10
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8268
Kent Oyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8268
Kent Oyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #5959|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=225
Christian Ortega changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c_...@outlook.com
--- Comment #2
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8209
Giovanni Bechis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8193
--- Comment #33 from Bill Cole ---
(In reply to Sidney Markowitz from comment #32)
> I'm considering setting in a file for rule updates
> dns_block_time 3600
> instead of leaving it set to the default 300 seconds.
+1
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8193
--- Comment #32 from Sidney Markowitz ---
I'm considering setting in a file for rule updates
dns_block_time 3600
instead of leaving it set to the default 300 seconds.
Reasons for:
* If a dnsbl does return a BLOCKED code, then it is the cas
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8193
Sidney Markowitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXE
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8209
--- Comment #3 from Giovanni Bechis ---
Created attachment 5968
--> https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=5968&action=edit
new welcomelist
New welcomelist which will not include support@, sales@, info@, helpdesk@,
contact@
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8209
Bill Cole changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||billc...@apache.org
--- Comment #2 from
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8209
Giovanni Bechis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||giova...@paclan.it
--- Comment #1
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8282
Bug ID: 8282
Summary: HashBL doesn't always honor uridnsbl_skip_domains
Product: Spamassassin
Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8281
Bug ID: 8281
Summary: remove uribl.com from default ruleset
Product: Spamassassin
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: n
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8206
Arpi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arpi.sa...@interoot.hu
--- Comment #4 from A
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8193
--- Comment #30 from John Hardin ---
(In reply to John Hardin from comment #29)
> (In reply to Sidney Markowitz from comment #28)
> > Deleting rules/25_dnswl.cf
>
> There are a couple of meta rules that depend on __RCVD_IN_DNSWL that
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8193
John Hardin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jhar...@impsec.org
--- Comment #29 fr
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8280
--- Comment #9 from William Herrin ---
Ran spamd with -D spf,dns as suggested. Trimmed logs follow:
Sep 24 15:41:18 speech spamd[2151352]: spf: found EnvelopeFrom
'donotre...@overdrive.com' from header
Sep 24 15:41:18 speech spamd[2151352]:
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8280
--- Comment #8 from William Herrin ---
Dig uses resolv.conf unless overridden on the command line (which I did not).
nsswitch and the related libraries are not involved in DNS TXT lookups; they're
only for IP address lookups related to the g
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8193
Sidney Markowitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8280
--- Comment #7 from Bill Cole ---
(In reply to William Herrin from comment #5)
> tcpdumping on my mail server, I see a UDP DNS request going out for TXT
> overdrive.com, a UDP response returning with the truncated flag and no
> followup TCP
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8193
--- Comment #27 from Sidney Markowitz ---
After (over)thinking about it some more...
This is a major bug because it causes false negatives in some easily possible
use cases instead of warning messages without false results. What has been
co
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8280
--- Comment #6 from Bill Cole ---
(In reply to William Herrin from comment #3)
> Howdy,
>
> My resolver does TCP fallback fine, as evidenced by the successful "dig"
> command.
Dig sidesteps the system resolver and does DNS on its own witho
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8280
--- Comment #5 from William Herrin ---
tcpdumping on my mail server, I see a UDP DNS request going out for TXT
overdrive.com, a UDP response returning with the truncated flag and no followup
TCP attempt.
Trying with "dig" shows the UDP req
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8280
--- Comment #4 from William Herrin ---
Note that my resolver limits EDNS UDP to 1280 bytes, so it may truncate UDP
sooner than yours does.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8280
--- Comment #3 from William Herrin ---
Howdy,
My resolver does TCP fallback fine, as evidenced by the successful "dig"
command. Does the SPF module successfully do TCP fallback?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8280
Bill Cole changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||billc...@apache.org
--- Comment #2 from
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8280
--- Comment #1 from William Herrin ---
Note that the machine running Spamassassin is Debian Linux 12.7 with the
debian-packaged spamassassin 4.0.0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8280
William Herrin changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS|Windows 10 |Linux
CC|
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8280
Bug ID: 8280
Summary: spf fails if too much DNS TXT data
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 4.0.0
Hardware: PC
OS: Windows 10
Status: NEW
Severity: norma
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8193
--- Comment #26 from Bill Cole ---
(In reply to Sidney Markowitz from comment #20)
> I'm convinced. I've updated the wiki to say that we no longer enable DNSWL
> by default. The wiki already stated that our policy is not to default enable
>
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8193
--- Comment #25 from Benny Pedersen ---
it removed in spamassassin, but data is still provided from dnswl, if i
remember is right it was a AskDNS rule
for the deny line i agre it should only be there is not wanted results from
this data
im
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8193
--- Comment #24 from Sidney Markowitz ---
I didn't mean that dwl.dnswl.org doesn't exist, just that there are no rules
for it in the default SpamAssassin installation or in sa-update so you don't
need to disable it in a default setup.
If yo
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8193
--- Comment #23 from Benny Pedersen ---
tux ~ # dig junc.eu.dwl.dnswl.org
junc.eu.dwl.dnswl.org. 3600IN A 127.0.5.1
tux ~ # dig dnswl.org.dwl.dnswl.org
dwl.dnswl.org. 10800 IN SOA a.dwl-ns.dnswl.org.
ad
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8193
--- Comment #22 from Sidney Markowitz ---
(In reply to Benny Pedersen from comment #21)
According to
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPAMASSASSIN/DnsBlocklists
it will work to either set score 0 of every rule that is defined to
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8193
--- Comment #21 from Benny Pedersen ---
# dns_block_rule RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED sa-trusted.bondedsender.org
dns_query_restriction deny sa-trusted.bondedsender.org
# dns_block_rule RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED sa-accredit.habe
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8193
--- Comment #20 from Sidney Markowitz ---
I'm convinced. I've updated the wiki to say that we no longer enable DNSWL by
default. The wiki already stated that our policy is not to default enable any
dnsbl that purposely returns wrong answers.
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8193
--- Comment #19 from Henrik Krohns ---
(In reply to Sidney Markowitz from comment #18)
> The issue I have is how to handle this using only rule updates so that it
> takes effect without requiring a new release that people install. Do you
> t
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8193
Sidney Markowitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXE
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8193
--- Comment #17 from Henrik Krohns ---
(In reply to Sidney Markowitz from comment #16)
> Created attachment 5966 [details]
> proposed patch with meta rules disabled too and more comments
>
> I'm attaching a patch instead of committing this
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8193
--- Comment #16 from Sidney Markowitz ---
Created attachment 5966
--> https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=5966&action=edit
proposed patch with meta rules disabled too and more comments
I'm attaching a patch instead of com
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8193
--- Comment #14 from Sidney Markowitz ---
What about changing __RCVD_IN_DNSWL to
meta __RCVD_IN_DNSWL (RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE || RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW ||
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED || RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI)
I that enough to prevent the resource usage if all th
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8193
--- Comment #13 from Sidney Markowitz ---
(In reply to Henrik Krohns from comment #12)
> So now it's just using resources for nothing..
Is there a way to disable __RCVD_IN_DNSWL in rule updates that still allows it
to be enabled in a manual
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8193
Henrik Krohns changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||apa...@hege.li
--- Comment #12 from
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8193
Sidney Markowitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sid...@sidney.com
--- Comment #1
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8193
--- Comment #11 from Sidney Markowitz ---
I just noticed something that I want to add to this comment thread to correct
some misinformation:
According to the About page on dnswl.org it is not correct to characterize them
as a commercial org
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8193
Bill Cole changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8193
--- Comment #8 from Stefan ---
(In reply to Bill Cole from comment #6)
> (In reply to Stefan from comment #5)
> > I have wasted a several hours of my time because of this problem, and I want
> > to share what I discovered.
> >
> > In respon
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8193
--- Comment #7 from Bill Cole ---
(In reply to Stefan from comment #4)
> (In reply to Benny Pedersen from comment #2)
[nothing helpful
> If you are one of the people in charge of SpamAssassin and fixing bugs, then
> no wonder we are having
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8193
Bill Cole changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||billc...@apache.org
--- Comment #6 from
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8193
--- Comment #5 from Stefan ---
I have wasted a several hours of my time because of this problem, and I want to
share what I discovered.
In response to Benny, it turns out there is nothing wrong with the set-up of
SpamAssassin on my server a
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8193
--- Comment #4 from Stefan ---
(In reply to Benny Pedersen from comment #2)
> https://multirbl.valli.org/lookup/88.209.197.217.html follow this say me you
> can reject it before content filter, why are you btw ignore "BLOCKED" ?
>
> /etc/re
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8193
Benny Pedersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@junc.eu
--- Comment #2 from B
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8193
--- Comment #3 from Benny Pedersen ---
(In reply to Bernd Krumböck from comment #0)
> Hello!
>
> When I set up several mail gateways, I noticed that a high rate of the spams
> are delivered because of the Rule RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI. The Bayes DB
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8193
Stefan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@g0v.org
--- Comment #1 from Stefan -
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8262
Giovanni Bechis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #5962|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8278
Simon Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||li...@simon-taylor.net
--
You are r
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8278
apa...@kalvdans.no-ip.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||apa...@kalvdans.no-ip.org
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8278
Arkadiusz Miskiewicz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ar...@maven.pl
--
You are r
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8278
Bug ID: 8278
Summary: RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_* rules fail badly
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 4.0.0
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8206
--- Comment #3 from stephen-spamassas...@digitalnexus.org ---
I can confirm something like:
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8206
stephen-spamassas...@digitalnexus.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stephen-spama
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5549
--- Comment #7 from Peter Molnar ---
Unfortunately the proposed patch didn't make a change either.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5549
Peter Molnar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@petermolnar.net
--- Comment #6
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8277
smok...@softpixel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||smok...@softpixel.com
--- Co
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8277
John Hardin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8277
Loren Wilton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lwil...@earthlink.net
--- Comment #1
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8277
Bug ID: 8277
Summary: LOTS_OF_MONEY (__LOTSA_MONEY_02) incorrectly fires on
ham containing invoice number followed by a small
invoice amount
Product: Spamassassin
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8262
spamassas...@arcsin.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||spamassas...@arcsin.de
---
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8276
Sidney Markowitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Building & Packaging|spamtrash
Assignee|dev
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8276
Bug ID: 8276
Summary: all
Product: Spamassassin
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: blocker
Priority: P2
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8251
Sidney Markowitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8272
--- Comment #17 from Sidney Markowitz ---
(In reply to Joe Wein from comment #16)
> We are still seeing the problem with the latest batch of emails from this
> gang.
Just to be clear, you expect the link to be first decoded from quoted-prin
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8272
Joe Wein changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8275
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status|NEW
1 - 100 of 3658 matches
Mail list logo
