http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-29 18:09 ---
Anyone care to comment on this fix?
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #2550 is|0 |1
obsolete|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO|3597|
nThis|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-21 06:55 ---
> Another possibility might be to use positive return values for errors and
> negative/zero returns for various kinds of goodness.
According to the fine manuals f
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-19 01:22 ---
Subject: Re: RFE: add learning support to spamd/spamc
> learned or already-seen. but non-zero exit codes really have to mean
failure of
> some form or another,
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-18 12:55 ---
Subject: Re: RFE: add learning support to spamd/spamc
> --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-18 10:54 ---
> no, I don't think that's a
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO||3597
nThis|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-18 10:54 ---
'The only thing I'm unsure about at this point is the exitcodes for spamc, when
a
msg is learned the exitcode is 5, when it has already been learned 6, all other
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-01 12:41 ---
Subject: Re: RFE: add learning support to spamd/spamc
>
> What's your oppinion about that?
>
As a seperate command line argument, sure, open up a separate bug
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-01 12:39 ---
I think it would make sense to introduce the report message as spam
(spamassassin --report) feature into spamc/spamd learing part.
So spamc -d xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx -L
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-10 12:49 ---
Subject: Re: RFE: add learning support to spamd/spamc
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 11:02:48AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> (a) it's happened before (in pre-HASCL
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-10 11:02 ---
Subject: Re: RFE: add learning support to spamd/spamc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> http://bugzilla.spamassassin.o
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-10 10:58 ---
Subject: Re: RFE: add learning support to spamd/spamc
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 10:48:13AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> uh-oh... theo, any chance you could lo
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-10 10:48 ---
uh-oh... theo, any chance you could look at that? Nico's name seems to have
changed from "Nico Prenzel" to "John Newman" in the bz database...
--- You are
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-10 02:33 ---
Oops,
i think there's something went wrong.
No, i'am not John Newman! :-))
NicoP.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC li
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-09 13:56 ---
Subject: Re: RFE: add learning support to spamd/spamc
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 01:54:12PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://www.apache.org/%7ejim/committer
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-09 13:54 ---
Nico's listed on the committers list --
http://www.apache.org/%7ejim/committers.html -- as now having a CLA on-file.
I've fixed his bz user record accordingly, a
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-09 09:30 ---
Nico,
Can you please fill out and fax/mail in a CLA?
http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas
Thanks
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-30 07:44 ---
Subject: Re: RFE: add learning support to spamd/spamc
>
> Pherhaps there are other reasons. But then please explain it a bit more!
>
Relax, it is going in. I
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-30 04:22 ---
Hello SpamAssassin developers,
i've just read the "Revisiting high-level 3.1 goals" for the 3.1 release and
i'am frightened to the following.
> And the anti-goa
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-24 09:59 ---
To clarify.
Attachment id=2622 is the mentioned patch.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watchin
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-24 09:56 ---
(In reply to comment #31)
> Subject: Re: RFE: add learning support to spamd/spamc
>
> > this would be fine. I think following failures should be captured and
>
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-24 09:01 ---
Created an attachment (id=2622)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2622&action=view)
New spamc part
My new spamc patch which applies correct
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-10 07:06 ---
Subject: Re: RFE: add learning support to spamd/spamc
> this would be fine. I think following failures should be captured and
> differently reported:
>
> - no
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-10 05:03 ---
Okay,
this would be fine. I think following failures should be captured and
differently reported:
- no database (mostly wrong dsn)
- no access to db (pherhaps w
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-10 04:45 ---
Subject: Re: RFE: add learning support to spamd/spamc
>
> would it be possible to return in the respond header not only "Learned: No"
> if
> the learning does
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-10 04:25 ---
To clarify, I mean spamd should only return "Learned: Error" if the learn
process doesn't get passed successfully. This could happen e.g. due to
insufficient rig
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-10 02:25 ---
Hello Michael,
would it be possible to return in the respond header not only "Learned: No" if
the learning doesn't carry out?
Nice would be "Learned: Error", or
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #2551 is|0 |1
obsolete|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-07 10:00 ---
Created an attachment (id=2551)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2551&action=view)
SpamC-part + SpamD-part(Michael)
My first patch for an
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-06 10:27 ---
Subject: Re: RFE: add learning support to spamd/spamc
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 02:06:15AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> So the protocol could be for learn a s
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-06 10:22 ---
Created an attachment (id=2550)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2550&action=view)
Unfinished Patch
Here is what I have of the code at the
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-06 02:06 ---
Hello Michael,
now as plain text.
You stated that the development of bug# 1201 started. Because i'am very
interested getting this feature i want to talk abou
Hello Michael, you stated that the development of bug# 1201 started. Because i'am very interested getting this feature i want to talk about the realization. Now i already started the development of this feature by my own, as stated here before: http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status Whiteboard||Development Started
--- Yo
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-30 04:38 ---
As Michael Parker wrote on 2004-06-11 09:15:
>I've started working on this, and have most of it done. A few
>questions/comments, if anyone sees a problem with ass
39 matches
Mail list logo
