http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4346
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|dev@spamassassin.apache.org |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sta
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4346
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-01 21:18 ---
Also possibly related:
I started a script to learn about 20,000 messages spread out over about 10
maildir folders. I got an
OOM in my kernel log:
=-=-=-=-=-=-
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4346
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-22 00:56 ---
Possibly related: I started testing viable table obfuscation rules in mid April,
and with that was able to identify about 3k bounced spam that hadn't been
identifi
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4346
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-19 15:44 ---
Subject: Re: sa-learn: massive memory usage on large messages
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 03:28:38PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> you can see that's pretty subo
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4346
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-19 15:28 ---
'We don't skip them in spamassassin either. IMO, if a user wants to do it, let
them do it. Part of the "enough rope to hang yourself" mantra.'
spamassassin is e
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4346
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-19 15:15 ---
Subject: Re: New: sa-learn: massive memory usage on large messages
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 02:14:42PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> AFAICS, we don't skip su
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4346
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-19 14:15 ---
should we try to do something about this in 3.1.x? comments?
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watc
